Stage 1 differences
The fuel regulator may be a factor as many others have swapped out air filters to higher flowing units with no change in running, but I still think the ECU might need to catch up though to run at EPA optimum , that's a small joke right there. Have the regulator seen to and then you will know and while there ask your guy about whatever you need to know. HTH.
Peace.
The differences between the touring and softails is also something I was wondering about. I've read a lot of posts about running the touring bikes at 80-90 for long stretches, and I can't imagine doing the same on my FB, just because of that visceral feel. And I don't have a problem with it, at all, so long as I know that the bike is working properly. But at the same time, the idea of going to an RK is also poking at me. What is the difference(s) in the motor that makes the touring bikes somewhat smoother than the softails?
The differences between the touring and softails is also something I was wondering about. I've read a lot of posts about running the touring bikes at 80-90 for long stretches, and I can't imagine doing the same on my FB, just because of that visceral feel. And I don't have a problem with it, at all, so long as I know that the bike is working properly. But at the same time, the idea of going to an RK is also poking at me. What is the difference(s) in the motor that makes the touring bikes somewhat smoother than the softails?
For reference, the Road Glide/StreetGlide have a solid and rubber mounting design, where as the Softails are only solid mounted.
Softail frame is also shorter, stiffer, and more nimble, even on the fat boy.
You're pulling 90hp+ with 100+lbs of torque at the wheel with 100+lbs less weight, with a very solid and stablized mounted engine on a much much lighter bike.
And you have a big fatty rear tire. So it's gonna feel much more angry and ready to jump at the throttle.
The fat boy also has lower gear ratios which means it's designed to go at a faster speed than the touring bikes.
The bike is much lighter, better engine mounted, and faster by gear ratio. It's gonna feel much more angry than a touring bike.
Last edited by FranBunnyFFXII; Sep 5, 2019 at 03:45 AM.
As for the stage 1, do I need to buy the cable? Does HD provide multiple maps that can be pushed to the tuner by the consumer after the shop installs everything initially?
Also, will the new cam make any difference in the sound of the bike at idle? Will it bring the motor closer to the traditional HD loping sound?
Last edited by iHodor; Sep 5, 2019 at 11:13 AM.
As for the stage 1, do I need to buy the cable? Does HD provide multiple maps that can be pushed to the tuner by the consumer after the shop installs everything initially?
Also, will the new cam make any difference in the sound of the bike at idle? Will it bring the motor closer to the traditional HD loping sound?
The change in responsiveness today was I think due to the AF change, as was the lower rpms at given speeds. For instance, in fourth gear at 40mph I was barely turning 2K, whereas with the stock filter I would have been between 2100 and 2200 if memory serves. I'm assuming the increase in airflow was leaning out the mixture. Does it make sense that this could cause it to "cruise" at low speeds with less rpms? And be less responsive?
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders













