When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Matt if you use a 2 channel and run 4 speaks in parallel you will only have tenability over all four at the same time. You will not be able to separately tune each set of speaks bud.
Yup, my bad. I should fully wake up before posting lol.
What year bike?if it's a pre Rushmore what radio are you using. Yes get a 4 channel or two small amps in there like CVO mentioned. Those Diamonds could be a good idea and they fit in pre Rushmore bikes facing north south.
Those speakers can get very loud off just a little bit of power. I think you would benefit big time from not running those speakers in parallel.
In my personal opinion I wouldn't use an nvx on the stuff your using for speaks...I just don't think it is high grade enough to do them justice.
Disagree. I don't sell audio as a profession so my perspective is a bit different thus the SQ of an NVX is more than suitable for a set of Focal KRCs in the fairing of a sled.
If u have a money tree, then of course I would tear everything out of the fairing and adopt a different amp strategy but since the OP is pregnant with a 2180 and not expressing a willingness to go anywhere other than a 4180 then adding an inexpensive mini is a damn good solution. 180ish bridged with ***** and dials is a huge improvement over upgrading to a 4180.
Hell, that damn NVX even fits in the little cubby below the amp tray on the clutch side of the sled. Not a bad trade off for the negligible SQ difference that would be noticed on KRCs or BT6.5s.
Just my 2 pennies, unless the money tree presents itself.
Tail, I am not tied to the 4180 at all. I just thought that since I was happy with the 2180 the 4180 was a logical choice but as I have learned from you guys, tunability is also part of the next step.
If I had my druthers I would rather use a great sounding and powerful 4 channel single amp over 2 smaller 2 channel amps but if that is the way to go I can do that.
Either way I assume I will need another BT line leveler and obviously a re-flash for the 4 channel ability to fade.
BAL, My bike is a '16 FLHXS and the head unit is the stock Rushmore 6.5
Is the ARC 600.4 looking to be my best option based on the 3 criteria I am looking for? Please keep the comments coming. I am learning more from you folks every day.
Tail, I am not tied to the 4180 at all. I just thought that since I was happy with the 2180 the 4180 was a logical choice but as I have learned from you guys, tunability is also part of the next step.
If I had my druthers I would rather use a great sounding and powerful 4 channel single amp over 2 smaller 2 channel amps but if that is the way to go I can do that.
Either way I assume I will need another BT line leveler and obviously a re-flash for the 4 channel ability to fade.
BAL, My bike is a '16 FLHXS and the head unit is the stock Rushmore 6.5
Is the ARC 600.4 looking to be my best option based on the 3 criteria I am looking for? Please keep the comments coming. I am learning more from you folks every day.
Thanks again for the help!
You cannot go wrong with the Arc 600.4 for a 4 speaker system. It is built like a tank, does exactly as advertised and if you ever need to sell it, it has great re-sale value.
I like the tone of the DA's better, but that's setting in the parking lot. I don't think I could tell a nats a$$ difference at 80 MPH
Tail, I am not tied to the 4180 at all. I just thought that since I was happy with the 2180 the 4180 was a logical choice but as I have learned from you guys, tunability is also part of the next step.
If I had my druthers I would rather use a great sounding and powerful 4 channel single amp over 2 smaller 2 channel amps but if that is the way to go I can do that.
Either way I assume I will need another BT line leveler and obviously a re-flash for the 4 channel ability to fade.
BAL, My bike is a '16 FLHXS and the head unit is the stock Rushmore 6.5
Is the ARC 600.4 looking to be my best option based on the 3 criteria I am looking for? Please keep the comments coming. I am learning more from you folks every day.
Thanks again for the help!
Hell if that's the case the best quality amp that I have had on the tray is the Hertz HDP4. Really good damn SQ and solid power. My gut tells me it's underrated.
Many other options so take ur time. Currently pondering a few other amp strategies myself and that is not an easy task as there really are some pretty damn good options. Not a fan of the ARC if there is a chance in hell that u will ever run additional speaks in parallel. It's 150w at 4 or at 2 ohm from what I remember.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.