Polk MM Crossovers
#1
#3
#4
Thanks for the replies.
I really don't want the cross-overs "exposed" or in the tour pak.
What about using the DX series in the pods, with MM651s in batwing, powered by PN4.520D? Even though the DXs are 4 ohm, they can't help but be better than the stock units and should provide decent fill-in sound. Any real CONS in doing this?
I really don't want the cross-overs "exposed" or in the tour pak.
What about using the DX series in the pods, with MM651s in batwing, powered by PN4.520D? Even though the DXs are 4 ohm, they can't help but be better than the stock units and should provide decent fill-in sound. Any real CONS in doing this?
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#9
ya know.. fooling with these lids and the "new" crossovers I have to install for them as well, got me to thinking. I don't think I tried to mount the tourpak pod crossovers to the inside top of the tourpak pod. Anyone verify this so I don't have to pull mine apart? :-)
#10
UltraNutZ:
I was wondering if you were over-come by curiosity and checked to see if the cross-overs will fit it the rear speaker pods?
Inquiring Minds want to Know.
FYI: After much deliberation, I went the 4 channel route and ordered the PN4.520D.
Polk MM651s in the fairing for sure and still deliberating the rears.
I was wondering if you were over-come by curiosity and checked to see if the cross-overs will fit it the rear speaker pods?
Inquiring Minds want to Know.
FYI: After much deliberation, I went the 4 channel route and ordered the PN4.520D.
Polk MM651s in the fairing for sure and still deliberating the rears.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post