88to95

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 1, 2014 | 04:57 PM

#11

QC-RAIDERS-91

Thread Starter

Road Captain

Joined: Dec 2011

Posts: 571

Likes: 0

From: Québec

thanks guys, I got a set of 255 I got for peanuts , what you guys thinking about those honestly ( I could resale them easily if yall say they're the shittiest choice for a 95)

Nov 1, 2014 | 05:56 PM

#12

Stiggy

Seasoned HDF Member

Joined: Nov 2010

Posts: 17,548

Likes: 7,175

From: Oxford, Nc

Quote:

Originally Posted by QC-RAIDERS-91

thanks guys, I got a set of 255 I got for peanuts , what you guys thinking about those honestly ( I could resale them easily if yall say they're the shittiest choice for a 95)

The lower the intake duration, the lower the rpm that the torque builds and the 255's at 211 degrees are low indeed. Personally I think that cam is better suited to a 900 lb bagger that carries 2 up regularly.

The Dyna would fly at an intake duration b/w 225 and 235 degrees IMO. Several good choices out there that fit those specs.

Nov 2, 2014 | 09:47 AM

#13

QC-RAIDERS-91

Thread Starter

Road Captain

Joined: Dec 2011

Posts: 571

Likes: 0

From: Québec

so basicly the 254e would be a better choice since they put 224/234degre duration intake/exhaust?

I get the screaming eagle parts for cheap so that's why I'm talking about them, if money wasn't an issue I would definatly go with all the other brand out there

Nov 2, 2014 | 12:11 PM

#14

vdop

Road Master

Joined: Aug 2012

Posts: 854

Likes: 20

From: CT

254e is terrible. If you must stick with se I'd run the 204. I've run them with those pistons and a .045" head gasket, they always make great midrange tq. I've also run them in a 97" @ 10:1 with a street port and made 95/110.