Dyna Front Ends

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 1, 2016 | 11:57 PM

#21

NORTY FLATZ

Seasoned HDF Member

Joined: Jan 2015

Posts: 16,035

Likes: 7,155

From: Sandy Eggo's North County

I think they're called, "Sportsters!"

Oct 2, 2016 | 12:01 AM

#22

cggorman

Extreme HDF Member

Joined: Jun 2014

Posts: 11,448

Likes: 2,299

From: NW Ohio

I'm a bit confused as to why forks matter as a deciding factor for the basis of a bobber build. I know there are a couple different definitions for "bobber", but if you're building a custom bike, seems like the frame would be the starting point. From there, add whatever front end you like.

Oct 2, 2016 | 03:58 AM

#23

NorthWestern

Club Member

Joined: Apr 2016

Posts: 11,659

Likes: 8,469

From: Inland NW

Quote:

Originally Posted by NORTY FLATZ

I think they're called, "Sportsters!"

Oct 2, 2016 | 08:57 AM

#24

sharkey

Grand HDF Member

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 3,870

Likes: 499

From: Alberta

AFAIK the FLH's, Wide Glides, Softails and first Switchbacks all had the 41mm forks; not exactly a go-to for handling. My FXDXT had 39mm fully adjustable forks, but rare and pricey today. 39mm non-adjustables on Sporty's and all other Dynas up to '06, when the 49mm came out for Dynas. "New" Wide Glide has 49mm; IDK if the last Switchbacks were 49mm or not. I'd take the 49mm over the ancient 41mm any day; put some upgraded internals in it..."aftermarket" may have different front ends available but I'd like to be able to service stuff down the road. The 39mm forks are a tad skinny for todays bike weights...

Oct 2, 2016 | 09:06 AM

#25

Kopazzz

Thread Starter

Advanced

Joined: Jul 2010

Posts: 71

Likes: 2

Quote:

Originally Posted by cggorman

Makes sense. I guess it stems from my '72 Sporty front end which leaves a lot to be desired. Bottom line is I've owned the bike for over 20 years, haven't ridden it in 10, mainly ride my Road King, which can handle any pot hole you throw at it. When I started thinking about the bobber build, the first thing that came to mind was the shitty front end on the sporty. I know modern day dynas (and sportys for that matter) are far superior to a '72 amf sporty. Guess I didn't think through my post and just shot from the hip before hitting "submit." Makes sense to start with the frame and go from there. All this feedback is what helps me get a sense of direction. I have to decide if I want to go true hardtail or fake it with either a softail frame or a dyna with rear shocks exposed. A modern day 48 sporty would make for a badass bobber, but it's still a sporty and if I'm going to do this I want the true big twin with separate primary. Lots to consider...

Oct 2, 2016 | 10:13 AM

#26

cggorman

Extreme HDF Member

Joined: Jun 2014

Posts: 11,448

Likes: 2,299

From: NW Ohio

I would start by considering if you can even tolerate riding a rigid. Based on your aversion to the old sportster front end, I'd guess not...

After that, I'd spend few hours google image searching bobber pics with various search term combinations. Build a nice reference library of the bikes that speak to you.

Most of the reference library photos should have similar characteristics. Dig into those bikes and figure out what they're made from and why you like them. That will help you determine where to start and what your goal looks like.