looking for an opinion regarding tensioner
At about 1/32 deep with no significant scoring, does this look like a tensioner that needs to be replaced? The inboard tensioner looks nearly identical. Not going with gear drive. When the time comes, I'll install the SE hydraulic kit. 22K miles, 2001 Dyna Super Glide TC88. SE 203 cams, Mikuni HSR42. V&H 2-1 Pro Pipes,
At the point you are at, I would just change them now and be done with it...
I have used all the different "upgrades" to the 88" tensioner pads.... I would at least put new Cyco Tensioner pads on them and you will be good to go for at least another 30K miles... most likely a lot more...
At the point you are at, I would just change them now and be done with it...
I have used all the different "upgrades" to the 88" tensioner pads.... I would at least put new Cyco Tensioner pads on them and you will be good to go for at least another 30K miles... most likely a lot more...
Btw hattitude, interesting about those "pits", those are definitely better than what HD shows as being acceptable. Just an observation
If you won't keep worrying about it, you have some time, but you should start thinking about making a change.
You want to go least expensive? ... get some replacement Cyco shoes, new inner cam bearings, new required gaskets and be done with it
22k you say. I think of all the spring loaded tensioners posted on this forum, those are in the best condition.
Btw hattitude, interesting about those "pits", those are definitely better than what HD shows as being acceptable. Just an observation
If you won't keep worrying about it, you have some time, but you should start thinking about making a change.
You want to go least expensive? ... get some replacement Cyco shoes, new inner cam bearings, new required gaskets and be done with it
I was unaware that HD addressed the pitting. I am always willing to learn...
I would like to see what they said, and why they think the pads pitting (breaking off small pieces) is not worrisome.
I will admit I am initially skeptical of anything HD says about poor engineering on their part causing issues.... Don't forget, when pinion runout numbers started to get out of control, HD just kept "moving the goal posts" until they considered 0.012" as an acceptable run out spec ..... I strongly suspect anyone outside of the HD corporate family would consider that spec as absolutely ridiculous...
None the less, I would really appreciate it if you could direct me to the source of what HD has said about the cam tensioner pitting...
Thanks..
FWIW-
I agree with you that the outer tensioner at 22K miles, looks really good. But the inner tensioner is often in worse condition concerning pitting.
I bought a 2001 Springer, all OEM with 9.8K miles, in 2017. My tensioners were only 16 years old at that time, and with half the miles of the OP's. My outer tensioner had little wear & no pits. The inner tensioner was about the same as the OP's outer tensioner. I went ahead and replaced them with Cyco Pads at that time, for piece of mind, and because I knew it wasn't going to get any better...
Last edited by hattitude; Feb 18, 2024 at 08:33 PM.
Trending Topics
I run Lucasoil 20W-50 full synthetic, Lucasoil 75W-140 synthetic gear oil in the gear box and the same 20W-50 in the primary. Yeah, I know about the "all three holes" thing. I still use dedicated gear oil. I guess I'm just stubborn that way...or ignorant, take your pick:-).
My crank was made when they were welding the unit and is supposedly better than the post '06 cranks. I didn't measure the runout, but even if it was at or under the .003 they say you can have for slop, grabbing an additional 3 to 4 hp for GD is not worth it for me, plus the 203's are just fine, although a set of TW21 Andrews look pretty sexy. Again, thanks for the valuable feedback. We are, after all, brothers-on-2.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I put these in when I built mine, save you a lot of dough
https://www.zippersperformance.com/r...on-tensioners/














