Dyna Glide Models Super Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Barebones vs. stock FXD seat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 04:23 PM
  #1  
JerseyDevil's Avatar
JerseyDevil
Thread Starter
|
Road Captain
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Default Barebones vs. stock FXD seat

Looking to get a Lepera Barebones for my 08 FXD. For those of you that have the barebones how comfortable is it compared to your stock seat? The stocker on my bike isn't that good nor bad for that matter. Only have gone about 75 miles at a clip on it and it is tolerable to a point. I weigh about 205 lbs if that makes any difference. So if the Lepera is close I'm definately getting it.

Thanks
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #2  
HD7585's Avatar
HD7585
Outstanding HDF Member
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,269
Likes: 12
From: NJ
Default RE: Barebones vs. stock FXD seat

I have a barebones on my fxst, Gel............at first it feels like a brick........and about 400miles later it feels like a much softer brick [&:]
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #3  
expy's Avatar
expy
Road Captain
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 644
Likes: 5
Default RE: Barebones vs. stock FXD seat

I have the Barebones and find it about the same comfort wise but it gets high marks for looking much better than stock.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 06:47 PM
  #4  
2007fxdc's Avatar
2007fxdc
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,722
Likes: 7
Default RE: Barebones vs. stock FXD seat

I agree with expy. I'd compare the comfort to a stock seat, but that isn't saying much. My experience is that it is plenty comfortable, as you said, to a point and then your bum needs a break. Mine doesn't seem to get steadily uncomfortable. It's fine and about the samefor about an hour and then, boom, need a break. Really brings out the dyna's lines though and brings you lower "into" the bike and back a little bit. It's not a pack up and ride 1500 miles to Sturgis seat and it isn't marketed that way. But, it is surprisingly comfy for its size.

HD7585's comments are what made me not consider the gel. I heard that if it's the least little bit cool out, the gel feels hard.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #5  
SPECIAL ED's Avatar
SPECIAL ED
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,572
Likes: 5
From: Templeton California
Default RE: Barebones vs. stock FXD seat

it is surprisingly comfy for its size.
I think that sums it up perfectly.I was so pleasantly suprised by it's comfort I gave away my stock seat.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #6  
96 Wide Glide's Avatar
96 Wide Glide
Road Master
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 794
Likes: 3
From:
Default RE: Barebones vs. stock FXD seat

I think your going to regret that!
Last week I went on my first over 50mi ride since getting a Corbin Hollywood Solo, (much like the Barebones, just more expensive ). After a 2 1/2 hour ride including two smoke breaks, my tailbone was killing me! Never again! All out of town rides, the stock 2-up seat goes back on. Either that or I may try to slip a Mustang Vintage Solo past the war department, for use on longer solo rides .

Cheers... Ben.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 08:18 PM
  #7  
ron1026's Avatar
ron1026
Road Captain
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 515
Likes: 41
From: long island ny
Default RE: Barebones vs. stock FXD seat

I've got the bare bones on my sg and it looks great and seems comfy but it puts me too far back to be comfortable with the forwards and drag bars, am thinking about the corbin close solo, has anyone got any experience with it.

Thanks Ron
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 10:57 PM
  #8  
JerseyDevil's Avatar
JerseyDevil
Thread Starter
|
Road Captain
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Default RE: Barebones vs. stock FXD seat

Thanks fellas, one more thing. How far back would you say it puts you? I definitely want to go lower but don't want to go too far back with the forward controls, I'm 5'10" with a 32" inseam.
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 01:50 AM
  #9  
SK8ROD's Avatar
SK8ROD
Banned
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Barebones vs. stock FXD seat

ive done a lot of miles on mine now and am amazed at how comfortable it is. Frst time i got on it i thought i had made a mistake in buying one, but a few miles later it was clear just how cool this seat is. Biggest run was just over 1000 miles in two days and no problems at all just a little saddle weary at the end , but the next day i headed into London for work and no worries, comfortable all the way. - pete
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 07:10 AM
  #10  
2007fxdc's Avatar
2007fxdc
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,722
Likes: 7
Default RE: Barebones vs. stock FXD seat

ORIGINAL: JerseyDevil

Thanks fellas, one more thing. How far back would you say it puts you? I definitely want to go lower but don't want to go too far back with the forward controls, I'm 5'10" with a 32" inseam.
JD, I'd say about an inch to an inch and a half. But, as you can see in the pix of it, the surface of the seat is pretty much free ranging *** area as there is no real "pocket" or "bucket" to sit in. So, you can really plant yourself on it wherever you want. Some people don't like that aspect of it but I do. It isn't specifically made for tall people so I think you'll be fine with it. So, it's not that it moves you back on purpose, it just gives you room to slide back further if you want. I'm 6'4" but my inseam is only 34" compared to your 32" and I could still ride the bike even further back if I wanted to.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.