2009 2010 Fat Bob Displacement

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Aug 23, 2009 | 02:24 AM

ElusiveThorn

Thread Starter

Tourer

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 449

Likes: 5

2009 2010 Fat Bob Displacement

I've seen that a 2010 Displacement on a FXDF is 11 cc less than a 2009 and 2008 FXDF. Why would that be?

Aug 23, 2009 | 07:59 AM

RollaMo

Grand HDF Member

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 4,585

Likes: 673

From: Rolla

Where have you seen that listed at?

The 2010 uses the same engine and the '08 and '09
96 c.i. twin cam

Aug 23, 2009 | 05:14 PM

ElusiveThorn

Thread Starter

Tourer

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 449

Likes: 5

http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/24417/...ob---FXDF.aspx Specifications of the 2009 FXDF

http://www.powersportsnetwork.com/en...leCode=1364921 Specifications of the 2010 FXDF

Look at displacement. I'm just curious.

Aug 23, 2009 | 05:37 PM

Gary7

Road Warrior

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 1,530

Likes: 1

From: Upstate, SC

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElusiveThorn

The bore and stroke listed for each is the same: 95.25mm X 111.25, which means the displacement is identical. Thus, the discrepancy in the CCs listed must be a typo.

Aug 23, 2009 | 05:40 PM

ElusiveThorn

Thread Starter

Tourer

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 449

Likes: 5

I checked several different web sites all with the same results. But like you said it's probably a typo mistake.

Last edited by ElusiveThorn; Aug 23, 2009 at 05:43 PM.

Aug 23, 2009 | 07:04 PM

dope_man_21

Ultimate HDF Member

Joined: Nov 2007

Posts: 6,799

Likes: 8

From: Carrollton, Georgia

http://www.metric-conversions.org/vo...entimeters.htm

according to this converter 96 cubic inches equals 1573.158 cm³. I guess it all depends on how far you carry out the decimal point