When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Dyna Glide ModelsSuper Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
So I am studying the various rear lowering blocks available for my wifes 05 Super Glide. I keep looking at the Arlen Ness kit and the other various brands(Burley, Tamarack, White Bros, etc). To anyone that has either of these kits, could you take a picture for me of the lower shock mount so I can see how the block sits on the swing arm?
(If you are wondering...) The reason I am asking for this is that it appears that the Ness kit mounts to the swing arm with the center hole then has a rearward hole for the shock to bold to at the end of the block. The other brands all appear to mount to the swing arm at the end of the block, then the shock mount to the middle of the block. I want to confirm that since there is a $50 difference in price between the Ness kit and the other brands. If the block mounts to the swing arm via the center hole, this will not allow the block to pivot on the swing arm when the bike is jacked up, when it bolts to the end of the block and you jack the bike up, the block pivots up and the rear wheel hangs real low. I am just not a fan of this design. I had lowering blocks on my wife's old Honda Shadow and hated the design. It never seemed entirely safe to me.
Are you sure you're not overthinking this, man? They're just blocks, regardless of price. All any of them are gonna do is move the lower shock mount further out. I understand what you're explaining, but you may be nitpicking...
I pondered the lowering blocks myself but everyone will tell you that shorter shocks are not that much more expensive and are probably an upgrade on the stock shocks so do what I did and spend about $200 on some lower Progressive 412's or something. Others will argue that there are much better shocks out there, and there are but if the objective is to lower the bike cheaply I would do it this way. I think the blocks will ruin your ride also. Just one man's opinion.
Well heres my opinion....i have the shorter shocks and took them off and went to blocks...My ride is MUCH better with the stock shocks.U lose travel with the shorter shocks and do not with the blocks.I have never bottomed out solo or 2-up.I also lowered the front of the bike.I have the lbm blocks and love them.I would highly reccommend spending 50.00 on the blocks guys before 200.00 on the shocks just to find out ya dont like the ride.This is just my finding guys...
This is my wifes bike. She will probably never have saddle bags on the bike. The bike never carries a passenger, so the lost weight capacity is no big deal with the blocks. I have read too many reviews on the cheap shocks and everyone says the same thing - too hard. That is one thing she loves about her Dyna, how "nice" (soft) it rides. (And to her a Cadillac rides nice and a sports car rides too hard, so a more performance based shock wont be better)
Yes, I want to be cheap, but at the same time, I was not 100% comfortable with the blocks on the Honda. I dont think there was really ever an issue with them on the road, but it was one of those things that bothered me.
If your not running bags and want to keep a soft ride while dropping the rear end, its awfully hard to beat the blocks. I bought the Tamarack blocks. After installing them on my bike, I find it hard to believe these things could ever fail. Its not like its a moving part...and just to mention, its about 3 times thicker than the stock location point. So I feel reasonably safe.
Are you sure you're not overthinking this, man? They're just blocks, regardless of price. All any of them are gonna do is move the lower shock mount further out. I understand what you're explaining, but you may be nitpicking...
hehe i was thinking the same thing - i wonder if mexicans are this concerned with what lifting blocks to put on the s10 or what wheel spacers to use on their nissan
bottom line its the cheap (if not wrong) way to lower a bike.
Also make sure she inspects them often - a good area for fatigue and failure
So I am studying the various rear lowering blocks available for my wifes 05 Super Glide. I keep looking at the Arlen Ness kit and the other various brands(Burley, Tamarack, White Bros, etc). To anyone that has either of these kits, could you take a picture for me of the lower shock mount so I can see how the block sits on the swing arm?
(If you are wondering...) The reason I am asking for this is that it appears that the Ness kit mounts to the swing arm with the center hole then has a rearward hole for the shock to bold to at the end of the block. The other brands all appear to mount to the swing arm at the end of the block, then the shock mount to the middle of the block. I want to confirm that since there is a $50 difference in price between the Ness kit and the other brands. If the block mounts to the swing arm via the center hole, this will not allow the block to pivot on the swing arm when the bike is jacked up, when it bolts to the end of the block and you jack the bike up, the block pivots up and the rear wheel hangs real low. I am just not a fan of this design. I had lowering blocks on my wife's old Honda Shadow and hated the design. It never seemed entirely safe to me.
The block pivots when you jack the bike up!
Are you kidding? It sounds like you're planing to leave the bolts looose!
I had blocks and took them off for shorter shocks. I guess I'll find out how different the ride is. I'm not gonna sell the blocks yet just in-case I don't like the ride.
The year I rode with the blocks on I never had a problem at all. I took them off to go lower.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.