When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Engine Mechanical TopicsDiscussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.
Second that. R&R has their '99-06 billet camplate for gear-driven cams (uses outer cam bearings) on sale for $200. That's what I used along with the 07-up HD oil pump on my build running steep-ramp .619" lift cams and 10.65:1 compression (198.5 psi CCP) and have had no issues with gear alignment, sumping, or oil pressure
Would be a pretty good deal, unfortunately mines an '07, so it's $320 and not on sale. So, it will have to wait a bit. I will have a look at the lifters on Tuesday. Try n post a pic as I don't know exactly what to look for.
Would be a pretty good deal, unfortunately mines an '07, so it's $320 and not on sale. So, it will have to wait a bit. I will have a look at the lifters on Tuesday. Try n post a pic as I don't know exactly what to look for.
Fortunately, I have never had a lifter fail (yet). My 2000 Dyna came with the superior HD/Johnson Hylift lifters from the factory and I replaced them with Feuling HP+ lifters during the third build at approximately 10k miles (probably unnecessary). Unfortunately, the only pics I could find of failed lifters are on other forums (not sure about the rules here on linking to other forums).
Basically, the first thing that you are looking for is scuffing (appears "frosted") on the roller surface where the roller contacts the cam lobes (should look smooth and unscuffed) indicating that the roller is not rotating freely in synch with the cam lobe, causing wear and noise. The second thing to look for is the smooth operation of the bearings in the center of the roller under firm finger pressure through the entire 360 degree rotation of the roller. If the bearings do not move smoothly and effortlessly throughout the entire 360 degree rotation (there is a glitch/roughness during the rotation or detectible noise under firm finger pressure while rotating), then there is an issue and the lifter should be replaced. The third thing to look for is scuffing on/grooves in the outer surfaces of the lifter housing where it rides in the crankcase lifter bore. The fourth thing that you are looking for is movement of the piston inside the lifter housing when pushing on it with a pushrod. Pumped-up lifters should not allow the piston to move at all with the force that you can apply using a pushrod, unless you are Superman. A lifter that allows you to move the piston with normal human strength indicates that it is collapsing while in operation.
Depending on the type of lifters in your bike now (HD "C" lifters should be replaced regardless for your build IMO) and the results of the above testing (fail), all four lifters should be replaced IMO.
Comp Cams lifters are Chevy lifters and are much less expensive than the other two but have a smaller orifice to feed oil up through the pushrods to the top end than the AMS/Johnson Hylifts or the S&S lifters. Whether that is a big deal or not is your call (much disagreement about this).
I have recently experienced a lifter that would not hold a pump at higher rpm's. worked fine at rpm's less than 2k and i could not physically collapse it by hand but when in demand at higher rpm it would get noisy (real noisy). Unfortunately when it's like this all you can do is replace them all or if by chance they are still under some kind of warranty send them all back to the manufacturer and let them sort it out...
Unless the OP has changed lifters, he is running the OEM "B" lifter; the best the MoCo has made. There have not been many reported issues with the B lifters, even in performance applications; however, that does not mean that they can't go bad. Of course the OP should inspect the lifters as dynawg1 suggests but I would not worry about scuffing on the outer surfaces; "grooves" yes but not scuffing that could be polished out. There is no way that I know of to check a lifter that bleeds down at higher rpms as in the case of 98hotrodfatboy. One would just have to guess which lifter is losing its prime at higher rpms and replace it.
The OP has referred to a "ticking" sound that turns into a "high pitched squealing or whirring sound". That indicates to me that the sounds are two different sounds with two different sources. The ticking is most likely valve train noise that can be reduced or eliminated with more preload on the lifters. The squealing/whirring sound is most likely coming from something rotating in the cam chest or even the primary but the OP seems to be focused on the cam chest. So, he should be looking at all rotating components in the cam chest for the source of that noise.
I hope the OP posts some pictures of the cam chest and components as he tears into it. I am also interested in his compression numbers.
Fortunately, I have never had a lifter fail (yet). My 2000 Dyna came with the superior HD/Johnson Hylift lifters from the factory and I replaced them with Feuling HP+ lifters during the third build at approximately 10k miles (probably unnecessary). Unfortunately, the only pics I could find of failed lifters are on other forums (not sure about the rules here on linking to other forums).
Basically, the first thing that you are looking for is scuffing (appears "frosted") on the roller surface where the roller contacts the cam lobes (should look smooth and unscuffed) indicating that the roller is not rotating freely in synch with the cam lobe, causing wear and noise. The second thing to look for is the smooth operation of the bearings in the center of the roller under firm finger pressure through the entire 360 degree rotation of the roller. If the bearings do not move smoothly and effortlessly throughout the entire 360 degree rotation (there is a glitch/roughness during the rotation or detectible noise under firm finger pressure while rotating), then there is an issue and the lifter should be replaced. The third thing to look for is scuffing on/grooves in the outer surfaces of the lifter housing where it rides in the crankcase lifter bore. The fourth thing that you are looking for is movement of the piston inside the lifter housing when pushing on it with a pushrod. Pumped-up lifters should not allow the piston to move at all with the force that you can apply using a pushrod, unless you are Superman. A lifter that allows you to move the piston with normal human strength indicates that it is collapsing while in operation.
Depending on the type of lifters in your bike now (HD "C" lifters should be replaced regardless for your build IMO) and the results of the above testing (fail), all four lifters should be replaced IMO.
Comp Cams lifters are Chevy lifters and are much less expensive than the other two but have a smaller orifice to feed oil up through the pushrods to the top end than the AMS/Johnson Hylifts or the S&S lifters. Whether that is a big deal or not is your call (much disagreement about this).
Thanks a lot for all the detail, will definitely come in handy when I get them removed. New S&S lifters come with the 106" Hot Set Up kit, so they are new, not to say that they couldn't be bad. If they are, at least S&S should replace them. Unfortunately, looks like the project will be on hold for 2 weeks as I'm getting sent out for work....again.
I picked up a compression tester the other day, problem was, it didn't have an attachment that fit my plug threads, so I'll have to pick up another.
Thanks again guys, I'll post pics of everything when I return.
OK, sumping is ruled out assuming you let the motor get close to operating temps before checking.
To check cam timing, no need to tear down anything; just check compression, hot or cold, doesn't matter. If cam timing is off a tooth, the bike will start and run but not well. If cam timing is off, there will be a 15-20psi difference in CCP between cylinders. If both are close, cams are in time. If not, time to dig into the cam chest and check cam timing.
Aside from the lifters as dynawg1 has suggested, I would look at the tensioner of course. I have seen them re-installed with the spring and check valve in the wrong order; see the attachment. The next thing I would check is the fitment of the outer cam journals in the cam plate bosses. If you are still running the OEM camplate, you have installed hi-performance cams, driven by gears, under higher than stock compression and valve train load with the outer cam journals running in the parent material of the cam plate. I have never cottoned to that approach; even the first OEM cam plates (1999) in TC88 motors ran the outer cam journals in bearings. I have seen excessive wear in situations similar to yours in less than 5000. Even if you find there is no excessive wear, I would upgrade the cam plate to the 25282-11 kit with plate and pump; outer cam journals ride in a billet plate with bronze bushings.
Also take a close look at the oil pump components and the face of the cam plate where the oil pump mounts.
Get all that done and we should be sneaking up on the problem.
Well, I'm a bit surprised by the compression test results. You said you expected around 200, I didn't get near that. The rear cylinder came in at ~152, the front came in at ~163. This is with both plugs pulled, fuel pump fuse pulled, cold, and throttle wide open for 8 plus cranks. Does that make you think cam timing? I don't think I will be able to get at the cam before this deployment, it may have to wait two weeks.....
The cam will not take away from your effective compression however it's very possible that those flat tops are 9:1 and if the heads you got with the kit are the 89 cc heads then your ccp will be right about where it is, You need to get all the specs on all your parts and put them into a calculator to see where you should be. Contact the people that put it together, get all the part numbers and research the specs.
Well, I'm a bit surprised by the compression test results. You said you expected around 200, I didn't get near that. The rear cylinder came in at ~152, the front came in at ~163. This is with both plugs pulled, fuel pump fuse pulled, cold, and throttle wide open for 8 plus cranks. Does that make you think cam timing? I don't think I will be able to get at the cam before this deployment, it may have to wait two weeks.....
IIRC, your S&S cams are Easy Starts? If so, that would account for the low CCP. At sea level, your CCP, according to my calculator should be right at 200psi with 89cc heads, flat top pistons, OEM head gasket and 583 cams. The EZ start cams bleed off 20%-30% of CCP, which would mean the your actual CCP would be somewhere 185-195/rear and 195-210/front. The 10psi difference does not indicate that cam timing is off so, it doesn't appear to me that cam timing is the issue, unless the cams are not EZ start.
Can't do a compression test but can do a leak down test which is a better indicator of top end condition anyway. However, as I said, if cams are EZ start, no need to go there.
IIRC, your S&S cams are Easy Starts? If so, that would account for the low CCP. At sea level, your CCP, according to my calculator should be right at 200psi with 89cc heads, flat top pistons, OEM head gasket and 583 cams. The EZ start cams bleed off 20%-30% of CCP, which would mean the your actual CCP would be somewhere 185-195/rear and 195-210/front. The 10psi difference does not indicate that cam timing is off so, it doesn't appear to me that cam timing is the issue, unless the cams are not EZ start.
Can't do a compression test but can do a leak down test which is a better indicator of top end condition anyway. However, as I said, if cams are EZ start, no need to go there.
very good point. Forgot about that feature in the e-z start cams... They're working obviously...
IIRC, your S&S cams are Easy Starts? If so, that would account for the low CCP. At sea level, your CCP, according to my calculator should be right at 200psi with 89cc heads, flat top pistons, OEM head gasket and 583 cams. The EZ start cams bleed off 20%-30% of CCP, which would mean the your actual CCP would be somewhere 185-195/rear and 195-210/front. The 10psi difference does not indicate that cam timing is off so, it doesn't appear to me that cam timing is the issue, unless the cams are not EZ start.
Can't do a compression test but can do a leak down test which is a better indicator of top end condition anyway. However, as I said, if cams are EZ start, no need to go there.
The cams are ez start. So, I guess I'm still looking for the smoking gun. That noise I hear is bothering me more all the time, wondering if it isn't the cam plate. Won't know for two weeks or so. Still have to check that and the lifters......
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.