When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Engine Mechanical TopicsDiscussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.
Now I think my compensator is going. Too much power for the stock unit? Getting some hot start starter kickback. Any recommendations for which comp to replace it with. SE? Baker? Something different?
Thanks.
Early compensator; they hardly ever go bad. Doubt that too much power is the issue. My '02 FLHT is powered by an all bore 107" motor that makes 124TQ/110HP and the compensator has not shown any issue for 10K miles. The early compensators did have an issue with the comp nut being a tad too long to develop sufficient clamping pressure when the nut was torqued to spec and the nut would come loose. The fix was to remove the nut and shave .030" off the end of the nut. Check the attachment for clarification.
The Bellville springs can get weak and the old school fix for that is to find an old compensator, cannibalize a spring and add it to the weak spring pack. But if you think you have to replace the compensator, best bet is to replace it with another OEM unit.
Early compensator; they hardly ever go bad. Doubt that too much power is the issue. My '02 FLHT is powered by an all bore 107" motor that makes 124TQ/110HP and the compensator has not shown any issue for 10K miles. The early compensators did have an issue with the comp nut being a tad too long to develop sufficient clamping pressure when the nut was torqued to spec and the nut would come loose. The fix was to remove the nut and shave .030" off the end of the nut. Check the attachment for clarification.
The Bellville springs can get weak and the old school fix for that is to find an old compensator, cannibalize a spring and add it to the weak spring pack. But if you think you have to replace the compensator, best bet is to replace it with another OEM unit.
Now that you mention it, I thought I read somewhere that the 05 year had trouble with the nut coming loose and the fix was to add a washer and re-torque. Does this sound right? Also Do you know if they changed the torque procedure.
Somewhere I heard that the new procedure was to torque to 75ft lbs and the add 45-50*. Does not sound good to me.
Now that you mention it, I thought I read somewhere that the 05 year had trouble with the nut coming loose and the fix was to add a washer and re-torque. Does this sound right? Also Do you know if they changed the torque procedure. Somewhere I heard that the new procedure was to torque to 75ft lbs and the add 45-50*. Does not sound good to me.
Tech bulletin issued for '03-'05 models, torque to 70 ft.lb. and add 45* which will require at least 150 ft.lb. to 165 ft. lbs. IIRC, the service manual form my '02 requires torqueing to 150 or 165 ft.lbs.; can't remember which but torqued straight to that number without the 45* bit. If you think the noise is coming from the compensator, pull the outer primary and put a torque wrench on the comp not and see what you get; you will need a long 1/2" torque wrench; 150 ft.lb. is a but buster.
If it is loose, remove the nut and shave .030" off the end or go insert a .030" shim (both are shown in the diagram previously posted but you don't need both; one or the other). The MoCo sold shims for this purpose in several different thicknesses, up to 090" IIRC. Check with the parts guys at the dealer but unless they are older guys, they won't know what you are talking about. Find a machine shop and shorten the nut .030", clean the threads and use a couple off drops of red Loctite and torque per the procedure.
Forgot to add that it will hold up to the torque. Mine is holding up fine under 124TQ.
Good to know.
So I took the primary cover off today and the compensator nut was loose. Not excessively but it was easy enough to loosen it.
I guess I caught it in time.
Well here is the issue with my compensator: There is no spring between the two pieces with the interlocking teeth. Is this correct? Also in the service manual it shows the exploded view and there is no spring in the picture.
I know the 03s needed the shim or some shaved of the nut to get better clamping force but does that apply to 05s? I would think that by 05 they would have made the nut shorter to allow it to clamp properly.
Good to know. So I took the primary cover off today and the compensator nut was loose. Not excessively but it was easy enough to loosen it. I guess I caught it in time. Well here is the issue with my compensator: There is no spring between the two pieces with the interlocking teeth. Is this correct? Also in the service manual it shows the exploded view and there is no spring in the picture.
I know the 03s needed the shim or some shaved of the nut to get better clamping force but does that apply to 05s? I would think that by 05 they would have made the nut shorter to allow it to clamp properly. I have the new torqueing procedure TSB M-1170. Thanks again for all your help.
All early compensators are the same; all were subject to coming loose. You don't really thing the MoCo would spend the money to shorten the nut by .030" do you? As you can see in the attachment, no spring between the sliding cam and the cover. You might get away with cleaning the threads, apply a couple of drops of red Loctite and torque per procedure but I would shave .030"-.050" off the nut to insure that it can't come loose in the future.
There were three different thickness shims, .030", .060" and .090". The PN for the .060" is 24032-70 and for the .090" is 24033-70 and I have lost the PN for the .030" shim. I think it is a moot point as those PNs are now obsolete and it would be akin to winning the lottery if you found a dealer that had one of either thickness in stock but might be worth a try. You would be much better off shaving down the nut.
my 2 cents which in todays exchange rate is worth about a penny. He has a nice smooth bottom- mid range, i think looks real good. I don't know how big his wife/ girlfriend is so I can't say if he needs more torque or not. I'd rather run rich than lean. Lean gets hot and i'd rather change spark plugs than pistons. And it's a new build in break-in all the more reason to run rich
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.