When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Engine Mechanical TopicsDiscussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.
Steps were done by volume with water. the headers are not equal length, but tuned considering pressure losses through the bends on the rear head pipe. I do agree with the lowish flow rate on the intake, the flow was slightly compromised from the valves being sunk in the heads to accommodate the potential .276/.220 TDC lifts (might run a 1.725 on the intake).
if the valves are properly unshrouded,sinking them shouldn't be a big deal.if their sunk that far what are you doing about protrusion/geometry? We do a lot of 110 castings here and don't have that problem.I'd like to see a flow chart of these heads,with only 315 cfm,where do the start flowing backwards?
if the valves are properly unshrouded,sinking them shouldn't be a big deal.if their sunk that far what are you doing about protrusion/geometry? We do a lot of 110 castings here and don't have that problem.I'd like to see a flow chart of these heads,with only 315 cfm,where do the start flowing backwards?
Kirby, thanks for sharing your insight. They flow 324 at .800" lift and still want more. I just shared the flow at .700" because that is where most seem to stop their testing. I know they were sunk but to the extend I'm not sure.
Anytime...👍👍
Ive only had Baisley and SA Racing touch my heads, but Wolfgang knows his stuff, for sure. You and Wolf have to be on the same page as to goals (Ex:longevity), to have a successful build at the end of the day. Remember, your numbers (whatever they end up being), with be compromised by those street goals, and a full drag strip 124 numbers will be different than yours. Just the way it is....At the end of the day, its why its so hard for example, for my Crap Cali pump gas 126 street bike to run high nines N/A-you have to thread a very fine line between street and strip. Take some away on lift, flow, velocity, intake size, compression etc.... go slower and watch the big numbers drop. Add comp, lift, fuel octane, etc...it sucks as a daily driver-but youll be a hero with your buddies- Ive been at both sides of the coin and almost Ruined a very fast street bike cause I wanted more, more, more...
So, pick your poison, and even if you do, you Still might not get what you want...but you might get what you need.
I try to get away from the numbers game, so hard to stay away lol. Regardless of dyno numbers or track times, the bike will be fun to ride and on the street that's the most important thing to me. Just like you said, compromises were made to suit my needs.
Kirby, thanks for sharing your insight. They flow 324 at .800" lift and still want more. I just shared the flow at .700" because that is where most seem to stop their testing. I know they were sunk but to the extend I'm not sure.
ok,well they dont flow 315,they flow 323.better,but still not great heads.im thinking they will be a choke point for serious HP/TQ #`s,we`ll have to wait & see.we have a 124" street strip motor being built in the shop now with 376@ 28" at .650" lift VTR hurricane heads,
General question here. If velocity seems to be more important than overall flow when it comes to engine power (due to cylinder fill) how does one account for maximizing velocity when porting heads?
General question here. If velocity seems to be more important than overall flow when it comes to engine power (due to cylinder fill) how does one account for maximizing velocity when porting heads?
Keeping port cross sectional area down. 1cfm through a 1 inch pipe is exponentially faster than 1cfm through a 1 foot pipe. Or the garden hose analogy, putting your finger over most of the exit increases the velocity making the water shoot further, even though the same volume of water is coming out.
Keeping port cross sectional area down. 1cfm through a 1 inch pipe is exponentially faster than 1cfm through a 1 foot pipe. Or the garden hose analogy, putting your finger over most of the exit increases the velocity making the water shoot further, even though the same volume of water is coming out.
Yes, that I get, but eventually the velocity will grow so great that flow thru the intake will not increase. It's Bernoulli's Equation at its finest. That explains why the 883 Sporters that have been converted to a 1200 have more pep down low compared to their 1200 counterparts. The 883 valves are smaller so better velocity but get choked off in the higher RPM's. I'm curious if there's a correlation between a certain cross sectional area and cylinder displacement that nets the best velocity without choking off the engine so you know how large to make the valves before engine performance is compromised.
I'm sure like everything with the internal combustion engine, it's all a give and take depending on RPM.
You see velocity thrown out the window in favor of volume all the time. Probably the biggest example is carbs and throttle bodies. The 58mm is used/pushed far too often in conjunction with massive headwork where when the stock 50mm and some cleaning up and port matching would often yield better results. Someone here went so far as to tell me if I didnt get a 58mm TB with my 570 cams, my motor would never run right. Where this kind of stuff comes from, I have no idea. Unless your build is going north of 120hp, the stock 50mm is more than sufficient.
as with everything,the CSA,t body size,runner size,valve size & extent of porting depend on cams & how the bike will be ridden.we`ve used big t bodies with different runner size on small motors & visa versa to deliver the power where the customer wants it
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.