Engine Mechanical Topics Discussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.

TC88 description by Donny Petersen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #1  
Scout's Avatar
Scout
Thread Starter
|
Seasoned HDF Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,197
Likes: 708
From: (Toronto) Canada
Default TC88 description by Donny Petersen

Reprinted with permission of Donny Petersen, Heavy Duty Cycles, Toronto, Ontario.

DONNY PETERSENS
SPECIAL ENGINE FEATURE

FATHEAD TWINCAM88

Twin Cam 88 + 88B "Fathead"

Where should I start? Well how about first describing this engine, 4 ½ years in the making, as a bulletproof platform for the future. Designed with durability and reliability in mind, the engineers are expecting a minimum 100,000 miles before rebuild. I’m writing this in March and as of this date they already have a Fathead with this magic mileage and it doesn’t need a rebuild.

Yeah I know of all the mythical Evos that have supposedly logged on the magic 100 grand but lemme tell you that for every rider that’s actually done that there are many more exaggerating their motorcycles prowess.

The Fathead is gonna consistently do 100 grand without blinking. In fact there are parts in that baby that will not need replacing for a few hundred thousand miles like the pinion bearing that rivals those used in top fuel dragsters. This engine is overengineered. It is a superlative effort in engine design that I’ve never seen or hope to have seen in my 30 years of working on the V-Twin.It’s a platform for many modifications that are going to be extremely reliable. It is obvious to me that screaming Eagle is going to attempt to take charge and control this engines' destiny in the hiperformance arena.

Again, by March 98, the Factory has logged 2 million miles in testing with 12,600 hours on the Dyno.

You see! This engine has been developed to run stock forever and almost forever with Harley Davidson designed Hi-performance components. This is why it’s called a platform. If your heart desires this staging area for more power it will be available, reliable, fast and durable. For more info on this aspect see "Hopping up the Fathead" elsewhere in this issue.

Skeptical as all get out, I entered the room, which was full of engineers, product marketing people and William Davidson himself. The raw emotion emanating from Bill Davidson was readily apparent as Dr. Marty Rosenblum the Factory historian watched Harley history in the making.

I had my list of Evo deficiencies such as cracking cases, leaking base gaskets, oily venting, pulling case studs…need I go on. What had they done to fix these inadequacies in the greatest engine produced by the Factory up until 1999?

Wow!

Approximately 460 component parts of the new Fathead engine were laid out in front of me on a large table for my perusal. To my right, sat a fully assembled engine in its entire splendor. To my left was a 1999 Dyna twin cam 88 cubic inch Fathead motorcycle. Talk about Harley heaven. Only about 15 of the parts are the same as those used in the Evo. It took me three minutes to throw every criticism I was about to launch out the window. For this story see "Ya’ll ain’t Gitting in der boy. Dats were de secret stuff is." elsewhere in this issue.

What followed was three days of intensive training from 6:30 am to 11 p.m. at night on the new motor. The teachers were Bill Davidson, engineers"Skip" Metz, and"Koby" Kobylarz with "Spike" Kieffer giving the overview. Steve, "who bleeds Harley oil when cut" Piehl ran shotgun. "Mr. Clean", Kenny Sutton, the VP in charge of building the Fathead showed us late at night how he was going to actually build the engines in the Pilgrim Rd. 400,000 sq. ft. plant demonstrating all the quality control features. Jerry "Mr. Smooth" Wilke VP of HD and President and CEO of Buell ably demonstrated through his every action why Harley is successful and is going to remain so. Not a big Buell fan because of its departure from traditional Harley styling, Jerry’s enthusiasm and instruction soon converted me to being a big fan. And I’ll tell ya somethin’. For anyone to do that ya gotta be smooth.

Then the Factory Race Team head honchos Steve Scheibe and Art Gomper taught us about the VR1000 in a secret f
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #2  
Howard's Avatar
Howard
Advanced
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Default

I have a 04 roadking I am rebuilding the top end. The cylindres use a kit No# 16526-99
I have a set of cylinders off a softail no3 on cylinder is 16593-99 they are suppose to be
off 03 flstc, can I use them?
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2009 | 12:08 PM
  #3  
trigger1911's Avatar
trigger1911
Tourer
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 310
Likes: 39
Default

What about the cam chain shoes wearing out at 20K. Thats under-engineering in my book and costly!
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 03:26 PM
  #4  
tomato's Avatar
tomato
Tourer
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 20
From: Lakewood, IL
Default

Not to mention the crank run out issues...Poor cranks/flywheels, cheapened bearing (INA vs Timken), and, IMO, the poorly designed case and cam plate.
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 05:07 AM
  #5  
oct1949's Avatar
oct1949
Club Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 145,895
Likes: 821
From: 40 miles Northeast of Indy..
Default

"stock engine designed to run forever", thats a long time....
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #6  
katiedog's Avatar
katiedog
Cruiser
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 192
Likes: 10
Default

Over engineered!!! He must consider having to upgrade to gear driven cams general maintenance
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #7  
0734's Avatar
0734
Road Warrior
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 23
From: Summit, Mississippi
Default TC 88 description by Donny Peterson

I do believe that article is "years old". If he has written an update lately...please point me to it so I can see if this guy has a different opinion.

I must admit though, that I am still riding one of the first TC-88's off the assembly line. Mine is a 99 with an engine build date of August 98 and it has not flown apart yet. It sounds like it will at any moment but I just keep riding. Yes...I did replace the cam bearings a long...long time ago, but the chain and tensioners have 40K on them and after a recent inspection...still looked just fine. The TC-88 is likely the most ungraded engine the MOCO has ever built and a lot of the upgrades are offered by the after market just to keep the thing running. I do have a friend that has 145,000 miles on his TC-88 dresser and it has had one rear drive belt and one set of tensioners installed over those 145k miles.
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #8  
Green Machine 04's Avatar
Green Machine 04
Advanced
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default

I have 80k on my 04 Heritage. Problem free up until recently. In the process of addressing the tensioners we read so much about now. Other then that theres not a single bad thing i can say about it. I love my bike and will never get rid of it
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 03:36 PM
  #9  
0734's Avatar
0734
Road Warrior
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 23
From: Summit, Mississippi
Default

04....if you got 80K out of the tensioners...you were one of the lucky ones. I too plan to ride my early TC-88/95 right down into the ground for as long as I can get aftermarket parts for it. Most of the people that see you on your bike have no idea what model-year you have anyway. That friend I mentioned above with 145,000 miles on his at that time has just rolled over 160,000. He has been through two sets of tensioner shoes and 1 drive belt.

I would strongly consider the hydraulic tensioner upgrade. I had to be sold on it before I did it. It's money well spent and possibly the last time you will need to worry about tensioner shoes. Hang onto it....the newer ones just get more complicated.
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2010 | 05:50 PM
  #10  
2black1s's Avatar
2black1s
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 171
From: Simi Valley, CA
Default

I have an '02 TC-88B Duece with 80,000 miles on it. It still runs perfectly. The only things I've ever done to it besides regular oil changes (2,500 miles) is changed the cam tensioners at around 50,000 miles. I actually converted to gear drive so the cams changed too.

As far as the tensioners go, I only changed them because of all the horror stories I was told about them. But when I took mine apart the tensioners looked perfectly normal and I'm sure they would have went another 50,000 miles with no problem. If I didn't already buy the gear drive and cams before taking it apart I wouldn't have second-guessed one bit simply buttoning her back up with the original parts.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 PM.