When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Man I'm more confused than an old man with dementia. Sh*t I was first told EVO doesn't do as good on a touring bike than a TC. Then I was told EFI was just as reliable as in the later years except 2000-2001. Then I remembered someone telling me of the headaches of the TC top end. They would have to be changed to gear instead of what came on a stock. I also was told of a know issue with a certain part,if failed on the TC would case an engine to fail. That's why I wanted a Evo for the known reliability. Then there is guys bashing carbs. Then they started on the lack of aftermarket parts before 97. I now don't know what heads or tails now.
This is why..... Too many stories and no solid direction. Imagine being told 2 stories at the same time that conflict with each other.
Last edited by Ozark Joe; May 8, 2015 at 03:10 PM.
This is why..... Too many stories and no solid direction. Imagine being told 2 stories at the same time that conflict with each other.
Every bike from every year has pros and cons.
If you want a reliable and easy to tune/repair and don't care about the fuel system, go for a carbureted EVO, avoid models with Magneti Marelli EFI, on the other hand if you buy a Twin Cam 88 be aware about cam chain tensioner because it wears and need to be replaced at certain mileage.
If you want a reliable and easy to tune/repair and don't care about the fuel system, go for a carbureted EVO, avoid models with Magneti Marelli EFI, on the other hand if you buy a Twin Cam 88 be aware about cam chain tensioner because it wears and need to be replaced at certain mileage.
Hope this clarifies to you.
I that what I originally wanted an Evo but was talked out of it. I love simplicity.
Yeah I was warned about that issue on the TC. That the reason I'm wanting to lean away from them.
Last edited by Ozark Joe; May 8, 2015 at 03:53 PM.
Think of it all this way dude.
You just stepped into the evo section of a tech forum and everyone is telling you the first guy was full of crap. About 10 to 1 in favor of him being a dumbass.
I'd go with the numbers myself..
I own a 94 Ultra classic and have little effort finding stuff that fits. Handlebar controls, seats and some mounting hardware is about all that's different. The basics are generally the same.
Think of it all this way dude.
You just stepped into the evo section of a tech forum and everyone is telling you the first guy was full of crap. About 10 to 1 in favor of him being a dumbass.
I'd go with the numbers myself..
I own a 94 Ultra classic and have little effort finding stuff that fits. Handlebar controls, seats and some mounting hardware is about all that's different. The basics are generally the same.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.