EVO All Evo Model Discussion

Front motor mount

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2019 | 09:21 AM
  #21  
Kingglide549's Avatar
Kingglide549
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,576
Likes: 978
From: Viet Vet, crossroads
Default

Originally Posted by Schex
What throws me off there is, how do you account for the offset, front and rear rotors are usually not on the same plane, if they end up that way, wouldn't the bike be crabbing down the road?
That's why using lines on the floor makes offset irrelevant, just looking for parallel to each other, while the front, rear rotors and neck vertical.
Seems if you get the lasers off the rotors to hit the same spot on the wall, the rails won't be horizontal.

In a frame jig, the neck rake and vertical is set with frame C/L, everything else is built off of that,
using the seat rails for horizontal is ez access spot, but also assuming the neck is vertical,
I don't know how to verify that easily, but if bike wasn't wrecked, it should be straight up.

None of this stuff is 100% accurate,
but the bike goes straight, not twitchy in the turns, and tire wear is symmetrical, that and some cold beer is all I need.
If you have a wider rear tire or offset you will have to measure differently.
Hopefully get the same number going past the front wheel as there will be a space between the rear tire and front when the line is pulled.
Now I have heard HD has had the rear wheel from the factory off-center on purpose, Width problems and trying to make the final drive in line. (Sprocket to sprocket )
You are on your own with that one.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2019 | 09:27 AM
  #22  
0maha's Avatar
0maha
Seasoned HDF Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 4,799
From: Omaha
Default

I suppose the thing to do is level the bike (backbone), then test the angle on the steering neck. In theory, exactly perpendicular. In reality?? Who knows, but my sense is if it's off by something more than some inconsequential fraction of a degree, you'd already know.

What you need to know us what angle to measure at the backbone that will give that particular frame a true vertical at the steering head. Hopefully the answer is zero degrees on the backbone. Otherwise, the frame isn't square.

Maybe I'll do that on my ElectraGlide the next time I have the batwing off. Should only need to do it once. Doubt the frame is going to bend over time.

My personal view is to start with leveling the frame at the backbone, then finish the procedure from there. The proof will be in the pudding. If you do all that and the bike doesn't track straight, you either screwed up the procedure or your frame is tweaked.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2019 | 09:36 AM
  #23  
Kingglide549's Avatar
Kingglide549
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,576
Likes: 978
From: Viet Vet, crossroads
Default

Originally Posted by 0maha
I suppose the thing to do is level the bike (backbone), then test the angle on the steering neck. In theory, exactly perpendicular. In reality?? Who knows, but my sense is if it's off by something more than some inconsequential fraction of a degree, you'd already know.

What you need to know us what angle to measure at the backbone that will give that particular frame a true vertical at the steering head. Hopefully the answer is zero degrees on the backbone. Otherwise, the frame isn't square.

Maybe I'll do that on my ElectraGlide the next time I have the batwing off. Should only need to do it once. Doubt the frame is going to bend over time.

My personal view is to start with leveling the frame at the backbone, then finish the procedure from there. The proof will be in the pudding. If you do all that and the bike doesn't track straight, you either screwed up the procedure or your frame is tweaked.
I have not ever found one frame to measure "0" horz, and yet have the front wheel measure "0" vertical.
They are close but not perfect. (couple degrees at the wheel)
That is why I skip the frame rail measurement as I just can't fix it.( I do measure it just for reference.)
I don't want the rear tire running vertically with the frame, and the front tire doing something else.
That is my theory as to how i do it, for now, and I am all ears about how others deal with this.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2019 | 09:54 AM
  #24  
0maha's Avatar
0maha
Seasoned HDF Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 4,799
From: Omaha
Default

Originally Posted by Kingglide549
I have not ever found one frame to measure "0" horz, and yet have the front wheel measure "0" vertical.
They are close but not perfect. (couple degrees at the wheel)
That is why I skip the frame rail measurement as I just can't fix it.( I do measure it just for reference.)
I don't want the rear tire running vertically with the frame, and the front tire doing something else.
That is my theory as to how i do it, for now, and I am all ears about how others deal with this.
That's where I think you have a hole in your procedure.

What is the point of measuring the front wheel for vertical unless you have a reason to think the steering head is vertical first?

Granted, there is the possibility that measuring the backbone for level won't establish a true vertical steering head, but what else are you going to do? Unless you have established the steering head as vertical, measuring the wheel for vertical is really just an indirect way of measuring the steering angle.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2019 | 10:13 AM
  #25  
Kingglide549's Avatar
Kingglide549
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,576
Likes: 978
From: Viet Vet, crossroads
Default

The two wheels, front, and rear , in purrfect alignment.
If we are to skew that just to get the frame to say Zero from the uncentered rake....
I know what you are saying about diminish angles "do I actually have to forks centered."
The rear wheel exactly lined up with the front is as purrfect as it gets.
Is it not?
If we are to "Jack" that measurement or compromise it, we will forever run with the front wheel forever slightly into a turn.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2019 | 11:18 AM
  #26  
Racepres's Avatar
Racepres
Seasoned HDF Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 8,590
Likes: 3,361
From: Cental, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Kingglide549
The two wheels, front, and rear , in purrfect alignment.
If we are to skew that just to get the frame to say Zero from the uncentered rake....
I know what you are saying about diminish angles "do I actually have to forks centered."
The rear wheel exactly lined up with the front is as purrfect as it gets.
Is it not?
If we are to "Jack" that measurement or compromise it, we will forever run with the front wheel forever slightly into a turn.
I guess I don't get it... Most Harleys do Not track the rear tire exactly in the front tire Track!!! And No... they don't turn... they track down the road with No Hands...
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2019 | 11:38 AM
  #27  
0maha's Avatar
0maha
Seasoned HDF Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 4,799
From: Omaha
Default

Originally Posted by Kingglide549
The two wheels, front, and rear , in purrfect alignment.
If we are to skew that just to get the frame to say Zero from the uncentered rake....
I know what you are saying about diminish angles "do I actually have to forks centered."
The rear wheel exactly lined up with the front is as purrfect as it gets.
Is it not?
If we are to "Jack" that measurement or compromise it, we will forever run with the front wheel forever slightly into a turn.
You lost me there. That doesn't make sense to me.

I'll go back to this: The first step in your procedure is measuring the front wheel for vertical.

Why? What is it you think you are measuring when you do that first?

I don't think that measurement tells you anything unless you either (a) verify the steering head is at true vertical or (b) verify that the steering angle itself is at true zero first. Otherwise, the vertical angle of the front wheel means nothing.

The GlidePro/Schex method solves that by leveling the frame first. That acts as a surrogate for (a), and is built on the assumption that the frame is square. I'm not sure how you would go about measuring (b) independent of anything else.

Even if you don't think the frames are made square, you still have to start somewhere. You have to come up with something that puts the steering head vertical before the measurement of the front wheel for vertical means anything.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2019 | 12:28 PM
  #28  
Kingglide549's Avatar
Kingglide549
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,576
Likes: 978
From: Viet Vet, crossroads
Default

I am confused I guess?
If we square up the rear in all respects the finaly look at the vertical of the front wheel and it is off,
what do we do?
Ignore it?
or compromise?
Maybe I just do not understand the question.
 
Reply
HD Forum Stories

The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders

story-0

7 Times Harley-Davidson Chucked Tradition Out the Window

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jan 25, 2019 | 01:41 PM
  #29  
0maha's Avatar
0maha
Seasoned HDF Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 4,799
From: Omaha
Default

Originally Posted by Kingglide549
I am confused I guess?
If we square up the rear in all respects the finaly look at the vertical of the front wheel and it is off,
what do we do?
Ignore it?
or compromise?
Maybe I just do not understand the question.
Square up the rear relative to what?

Say you put an angle gauge on your rear wheel, and it measures dead nuts on the money vertical.

What have you learned?

I say you haven't learned anything unless you also know whether or not your frame (and therefore your steering head) are also vertical.

In other words, when you say "square up the rear in all respects", if that means you've squared it up to the frame and both the wheel and the frame are true vertical (relative to Earth, that is), then you've gotten to the same point as the GlidePro/Schex method. On the other hand, if "square up the rear in all respects" does not include somehow measuring the frame for level, you aren't squaring the rear wheel up at all, and any subsequent measurements of the front wheel don't tell you anything.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2019 | 02:42 PM
  #30  
Kingglide549's Avatar
Kingglide549
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,576
Likes: 978
From: Viet Vet, crossroads
Default

If the rear wheel is sq to the frame and swing arm ,
I guarantee you the front wheel will be leaning slightly left or right.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM.

story-0
7 Times Harley-Davidson Chucked Tradition Out the Window

Slideshow: Harley-Davidson built its reputation on nostalgia, but every so often, the company took a hard left turn into the future.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-20 11:18:19


VIEW MORE
story-1
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles

Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 16:50:35


VIEW MORE
story-2
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever

Slideshow: Not every Harley gets it right, but these are the ones that genuinely earned their reputation.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-15 14:23:21


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever

Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-01 20:01:09


VIEW MORE
story-4
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In

Slideshow: Killer Custom's "Jail Breaker" build focuses more on stance and visual aggression than mechanical overhaul.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-18 19:20:32


VIEW MORE
story-5
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?

Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-07 16:15:30


VIEW MORE
story-6
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept

Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's new RMCR concept revives the café racer formula with modern hardware-and it may be exactly the reset the company needs.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-04 12:23:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II

Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-02-24 18:19:44


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There is no shortage of great motorcycles to buy, but we would avoid these ten.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-02-19 14:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026

Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-13 18:33:17


VIEW MORE