When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The stock CV carb is a great carb. Good mileage/performance and it compensates better to altitude change. I am gutting my Morelli EFI, and replacing it with a CV this summer!
I removed the EFI from my 96 and put a bone stock CV on. A jetting to match the air cleaner and exhaust and it is hokden. Mileage went from 32-38 eith the MMEFI to 43-49 with the carb. And better actual performance. Will probably need to rejet again when I finish the cam swap. Easy-peasy.
The CV carb on your bike is just as good if not better then others and is pretty easy to use n o reason to look for anything else unless you are having problems with the weight of your wallet and your peace of mind.
As far as better well here is another point of view for you. If it aint broke don't fix it. http://www.johnsmotorcycleparts.com/...retor-test.htm
I call bullshit on your last claim. I've run them both on the same bike, and I'll give you throttle response and maybe power (haven't dynoed either setup), but no way in hell can the Mikuni match the fuel economy of the CV carb. When I had the CV carb I AVERAGED 50 MPG under nearly any conditions. The only way the Mikuni will see 50 MPG is downhill, with a tailwind. When I put the Mikuni on my fuel economy dropped from 50 down to 40-42 MPG. Even putting the "mileage kit" in the HSR42 only improved it to 45 MPG under ideal conditions.
What was your a/f ratio at cruise? The cv could have been jetted lean and the Mikuni rich. The mileage kit is a starting point, that's it; doesn't mean it was the right jetting for your bike... I get a kick out of people who just put in jets and assume they are right. I test my stuff on road, actual driving conditions, with accurate air fuel meters, so I know it's right. I do get 50 mpg, with a 100hp engine to boot. Call bullshit all day, run what you want, I don't give two *****. There is a reason used cv carbs sell for 50-70 bucks and mikunis are 3x that.
Well odd that this should come up as I was about to post about something I discovered today.
My 1999 TC is being a dog to set up, the carby just doesn't wanna give me the low down grunt I think it should...so I stuck on a CV from a 1987 FXR that I had lying around and its way better!!!!
So, maybe the OP has been told something about late-model (1999) CV's as compared to earlier ones....any carby geeks know if the specs changed along with EPA demands?
Well odd that this should come up as I was about to post about something I discovered today.
My 1999 TC is being a dog to set up, the carby just doesn't wanna give me the low down grunt I think it should...so I stuck on a CV from a 1987 FXR that I had lying around and its way better!!!!
So, maybe the OP has been told something about late-model (1999) CV's as compared to earlier ones....any carby geeks know if the specs changed along with EPA demands?
I have both carbs an 88 and 2003 and the biggest change is the early model did not have an accelerator pump circuit and the new model does, jetting has changed from year to year as well. I can usually get rid of the flat spot by using a stock 88 xl needle. I have never heard of a stock 87 EVO having a CV carb I thought the butterfly was in use on all big twins till 89 and the 88 xl was the first to make the change to a cv.
Maybe off-topic, but I Dynojeted the carb on my '98 FLSTS (EVO) back when it was new.
I installed a set of Samson (straight) Slip-ons w/S&E AC and I wanted to be be sure that the bike was running rich enough to keep it cool.
The bike get about 40MPG (not great) but it's ridden very little and the pipes are dark gray and it really sounds great and idles almost as good as a Shovelhead.
Last spring when I started the bikes up it ran like crap.
I tried everything from plugs, cleaning the A/C, fresh fuel, new petcock and filter.
I took the carb off and disassembled it and used compressed air to clean out all of the passages....NO change.!
I removed it again and replaced the accelerator, high speed jet, rubber diaphram spring, replaced the intake seals and again compressed air.....NO change!
For the THIRD time, I removed and disassembled and again used compressed air......Eureka!!!
All I can think is that there had to be something trapped somewhere inside the carb but darned if I could see it.
I'll have this bike forever, but I prefer EFI even though it's expensive to repair when it has problems.
the only reason i say that i thought my carb wasnt any good is because i just installed a ev-27 cam and i felt like it wasnt performing up to my liking, so i started reading and researching and many people say that the hsr-42 was the best. i later found out that my bike is a california model and is choked down to meet emissions. so now i am just goin to change out the idle and main jet. 180 and a 45 ? any thoughts.
(and thanks for all the debate it helps learn me up)
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.