When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The Common Core Frame seems like its going to be the next big thing to change at Harley-Davidson. Question is, what is going to be common about them?
Rumors surrounding the Core frame seem to indicate that the Touring bikes and Dyna Glides will be sharing this frame. If so, I hope that its a win win for both the Dyna and Touring line and not a cheapening of the frame for manufacturing cost reduction.
So, what do we know so far about the Common Core frame?
I haven't heard a whole lot about it but I think the likely underlying motivation is just cost-savings. That doesn't mean it has to be a cheapening of the frame in terms of overall quality, however. As long as it doesn't hinder performance or utility and is a sound design, it makes sense form a business standpoint to have a common part used across platforms.
To me, it sounds like platform sharing. The same thing auto manufacturers have been doing for a long time. It will certainly reduce engineering costs for the motor company, as well as reduced production costs. And I assume it would be mostly unnoticed by the consumer ad the Dyna and touring frames are already fairly similar.
To me, it sounds like platform sharing. The same thing auto manufacturers have been doing for a long time. It will certainly reduce engineering costs for the motor company, as well as reduced production costs. And I assume it would be mostly unnoticed by the consumer ad the Dyna and touring frames are already fairly similar.
It's really a blast from the past. Back in the old 4 speed days before the FLT showed up in 1980 all the big twin bikes were built off the same frame. Dyna and Touring sharing the same frame just like FLH and FX bikes shared the same frames back in the 70's. I'm sure it saves them money because they'll be able to make twice as many of one type of frame instead of having to have to manufacture two seperate types.
Can they come up with something that is lighter and stiffer than the the current dyna frame, and still work with the touring line? I hope so.
FXR frames were hand-welded. FXD frames were automated and the automation at the time couldn't handle making FXR frames, but since it was automated it was cheaper to make. I think automation has improved greatly since 1990s.
Then again, the current touring frame is really pretty good. Maybe they're just going to adapt that to the dyna line.
No matter what happens though, I hope the Dyna remains just over 650 lbs. Even lighter and stronger would be preferable. Have the rear swingarm mounted to the frame and retain the rubber mount Milwaukee 8 with only 50% vibration reduction.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.