Handling, Dyna V. Softail
Here's a post from another site that deals with Dyna's stability problems>>>
I had no idea that this issue is so common with the Dyna line and that there is an entire aftermarket that makes a product to help correct it. I'll bet that there are a bunch of Dyna owners out there that just accept the fact that their bike gets a little "shakey" cornering at speeds. Has anybody out there tried either the Sputhe or True-Track?
There's a reason they don't sell aftermarket handling "Fixes" for Softails>>>> Because you don't need them.
And how is that *anything* like a Softail frame?
And how is that *anything* like a Softail frame?
I can shift the bike by using the "feel" of it when I'm accelerating. At bikeweeks when there are a group of us taking off and everyone is laying into the throttle it's hard to hear your own exhaust over the other 5 bikes. I know when to shift by how the bike feels. I can't do that on my friends rubber mounted Dyna, I can never tell if the motor is wound up or not. He HAS to rely on his tach.
If a person rides both bikes and says "I like the Dyna better, It handles better and I like the way it looks" I can respect that. I ride what I like to ride, and I'll buy what I want. The people that make me laugh are the ones who don't like Softails because the Supposed Hard core biker mags don't like them. Or my favorite "I don't like Softails because Harley tried to make them look like rigids"!! So What!!!!. If you are INTO Harleys and you can't tell the difference between a rigid frame and a Softail frame you better find yourself a new hobby.
and shovelhead jack was gr8 too,but alas he has been banned for saying nothing wrong at all??especialy compared to some of comments on this thread????
no freedom of speech i guess,still trying to figure what was wrong with his post,his were best on this thread??mind boggles
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
Take a look again at the Softail's "swingarm" and see what they had to do to mate it with the main frame. The assembly may have two vertical triangular planes, but all that does is transmit any force to where the "swingarm" assembly mates with the frame. That is the weakest point.
And if a Softail has such a rigid, torsion-resistant, high-performance frame, as you claim, then why are we not seeing Softails in any racing applications?
Dude, a Softail is what it is. It is a heavy, plush ride with a "hidden" suspension. To achieve that "hardtail" look, HD made a series of design and performance compromises. (Actually, HD is not the original designer--they bought the Softail design from an inventor named Bill Davis.) The biggest advantage to the Softail design, aside from the suspension and look, is the large saddlebag capacity, unless you have a bike that has pipes getting in the way, like a Fatboy.
Don' understand what hap'nd ta Shovelhead J......alway's like'd the dude's post's, and really don' see anything in this thread that would'a caused any action,other comment's and name call'n by others were far worse than anything he post'd....maybe talk to an Admin an' get that reversed, possibly.........






