TTS Mastertune enrichen VE table
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 16
From: Texas
TTS Mastertune enrichen VE table
I'm wanting to add more fuel to my front and rear ve tables since I recently changed my ac filter from se oval to to the wider high performance oval one from arlen ness. Bike feels like it's running a bit lean or rough. I wanted to fatten it up some to see if it would smooth it out. I also changed exhaust from 2.5" baffle to mufflers with decibel reducers, so I think it might be more restrictive now.???
Would I increase or decrease units or percentage in ve tables to add fuel? And would it be OK to start with increments of 5 units? Any suggestions?
I don't have time to record a bunch of runs to dial it in atm, so trying to get it decent til I can record data runs.
Would I increase or decrease units or percentage in ve tables to add fuel? And would it be OK to start with increments of 5 units? Any suggestions?
I don't have time to record a bunch of runs to dial it in atm, so trying to get it decent til I can record data runs.
Last edited by SmittyFXDL; Dec 22, 2024 at 10:13 PM.
Cruiser
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 176
Likes: 43
From: New Port RicheyFL
I'm wanting to add more fuel to my front and rear ve tables since I recently changed my ac filter from se oval to to the wider high performance oval one from arlen ness. Bike feels like it's running a bit lean or rough. I wanted to fatten it up some to see if it would smooth it out. I also changed exhaust from 2.5" baffle to mufflers with decibel reducers, so I think it might be more restrictive now.???
Would I increase or decrease units or percentage in ve tables to add fuel? And would it be OK to start with increments of 5 units? Any suggestions?
I don't have time to record a bunch of runs to dial it in atm, so trying to get it decent til I can record data runs.
Would I increase or decrease units or percentage in ve tables to add fuel? And would it be OK to start with increments of 5 units? Any suggestions?
I don't have time to record a bunch of runs to dial it in atm, so trying to get it decent til I can record data runs.
Grand HDF Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 8,538
From: Bates County MO
I'm wanting to add more fuel to my front and rear ve tables since I recently changed my ac filter from se oval to to the wider high performance oval one from arlen ness. Bike feels like it's running a bit lean or rough. I wanted to fatten it up some to see if it would smooth it out. I also changed exhaust from 2.5" baffle to mufflers with decibel reducers, so I think it might be more restrictive now.???
Would I increase or decrease units or percentage in ve tables to add fuel? And would it be OK to start with increments of 5 units? Any suggestions?
I don't have time to record a bunch of runs to dial it in atm, so trying to get it decent til I can record data runs.
Would I increase or decrease units or percentage in ve tables to add fuel? And would it be OK to start with increments of 5 units? Any suggestions?
I don't have time to record a bunch of runs to dial it in atm, so trying to get it decent til I can record data runs.
Changing small amounts of airflow shouldn't make big differences in the way it runs. More restrictive baffles tend to need less fuel, and that AC flows a pinch more, so the combo should be within 5% of where you were originally. You will be better off by using a session of Flight Recorder and V-Tune to dial it in, rather than adding VE points randomly (like throwing darts with a blindfold on).
Last edited by rigidthumper; Dec 23, 2024 at 09:23 AM.
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 666
Best description Ive heard of guessing at calibration changes based assumption rather than data/measurement.
It would be better to leave the system to adjust for the minor changes from the stage1 (pipe/ac)changes. At least those changes would be based actual measurements rather than guessing at what the engine wants for best running.
Bob
It would be better to leave the system to adjust for the minor changes from the stage1 (pipe/ac)changes. At least those changes would be based actual measurements rather than guessing at what the engine wants for best running.
Bob
Cruiser
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 176
Likes: 43
From: New Port RicheyFL
Best description Ive heard of guessing at calibration changes based assumption rather than data/measurement.
It would be better to leave the system to adjust for the minor changes from the stage1 (pipe/ac)changes. At least those changes would be based actual measurements rather than guessing at what the engine wants for best running.
Bob
It would be better to leave the system to adjust for the minor changes from the stage1 (pipe/ac)changes. At least those changes would be based actual measurements rather than guessing at what the engine wants for best running.
Bob
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
