When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
In most cases and this is the best of all; it gives the bike a lowered rear look. And that's just for starters.
The other is and that is my fav. Is that it puts the gages further up where you can just **** yer eye ***** and not the head to glimps down at what the deal is with the ride
So its more than just looks. Its functional
I may just do it. I've always wanted to **** my eye *****
Just kidding. I don't actually care for the look myself.
I have lifted about 6 bikes. Why? For the increased air flow which does help the engine run cooler. A cooler engine runs stronger and lasts longer.
Plus it is easy to clean the rocker covers.
From a Superglide to a touring bike and Softails I have never experienced any loss of riding range. I raise them 1.5 inches in the front and 1/4 inch in the back. A profile of the bikes looks better (in my opinion) when the engine is more exposed.
I had the electronic tac/speedometer in the Super glide. I would run it until the low fuel light came on. Then continued low level came on and finally under range.
Did that three times and the fuel gauge adjusted its self to when it was very close to the original amount of about 0.9 gallons in the tank when the low fuel light came on. I could go 160 to 180 miles before the light came on.
Some like lifted tanks for the looks some don't. If you don't like it don't do it. But don't spend one second of your precious life worrying about what others have done.
And those who are offended by "cheap tabs" Mine on the CVO and others are triple painted chrome from Kury. A couple are gloss black and can not be seen from 10 feet away. If one cant stand " cheap tabs" could I suggest that you not stand there and stare.
Mine is 1.5" front and 3/4" up front.
The kit only provided for 1/2" and I added a spacer for the extra 1/4"
The kit I got from DK Customs is barely noticeable. No none else seems to notice either as it is one of those things I like to point out to ppl
And yeah, with my 5gal tank, I ususally dont see the fuel light come on till 186 mi later where I can easily go at least 25more before the low range warning
Love having access to the rocker covers too. Big plus
I love the look, and would do it on mine in a heartbeat. But if I raise my tank even slightly, the (stock) handlebars will strike the petrol tank. So I can't
If I ever do go to apes (which is less and less likely, year-by-year), then I'd put the tank lift on the same day.
I ride a Slim and although I added the 4.5" risers, the bars and tank were fine. I noticed the throttle cable line from by the grip touched slightly. So I tilted them back a smidge. That was before I installed the risers which I needed for a better reach
I ride a Slim and although I added the 4.5" risers, the bars and tank were fine. I noticed the throttle cable line from by the grip touched slightly. So I tilted them back a smidge. That was before I installed the risers which I needed for a better reach
Shame that doesn't work on mine. There's not even a 1/4" clearance for a front lift. I could maybe squeeze out 1/2" if I swapped out the tank caps for flushmount, but it's really not worth it.
~ No, it really is just for looks. To open up the motor cavity.
Except for the two functional reasons already mentioned; to improve the visibility/reduce the glare on the speedo and to (allegedly) increase airflow over the heads and aid cooling. The question is more whether or not these benefits are sufficient to outweigh the issues with the fuel gauge.
What's funny is how it's clear that you do value the looks aspect higher as you haven't even addressed the functionality points. Just because you can't comprehend them (or can't consider anything other than the aesthetics) doesn't mean others can't.
(FWIW, I don't believe that the benefits outweight the fuel gauge issues, but also don't believe that is as much of a deal as others make out. I'd do it for the looks if I could, as I actually like the look. But I appreciate others have different tastes. They must do, as otherwise HD wouldn't sell as many street glides as they do ;-)
Some like lifted tanks for the looks some don't. If you don't like it don't do it. But don't spend one second of your precious life worrying about what others have done.
Nobody is worrying about what others do...
The title of the thread was "Tank Lifts... Why don't you?" That asks for the opinions/reasons why people don't want tank lifts...
Other than stating personal preferences, I haven't read anyone bashing the tank lifts.....
For me, I've considered it for both bikes... I like seeing more of the rocker boxes, but I don't like seeing more of the wires... for now, status quo...
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.