Softail Models Standard, Custom, Night Train, Deuce, Springer, Heritage, Fatboy, Deluxe, Rocker and Cross Bones.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lowering question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2009 | 05:17 AM
  #1  
jkeeton81's Avatar
jkeeton81
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 448
Likes: 1
From: Denver, CO
Default Lowering question

Hey guys, If I lower the rear 2in do I have to lower the front as well? Whats the benefit of lowering the front? Thanks
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 07:24 AM
  #2  
Chazmanian's Avatar
Chazmanian
R.I.P. BROTHER
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 6
From: Colorado Springs
Default

Lots of guys lower the rear and ride off happily.

With my bike when I lowered just the rear it handled funky. It had a bad case of understeer and I didnt like it when pushing through the twisties.

I dropped the front to balance out the chassis get some weight back on that front tire and the bike handles 100% better and looks better as well IMO.

You dont have to do anything to the front as the bike will ride and for some it rides fine. For my riding style and geographical area (Colorado...Twisties!) I needed my bike to handle as good as a softail can. The 2.25 rear and 2" front drop make the bike handle better than stock. Its no Dyna or Sporty but its pretty derned good considering.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 02:26 PM
  #3  
XARAN's Avatar
XARAN
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,156
Likes: 41
From: So Cal
Default

I lowered mine in the rear 1.5" and did not do the front. For my riding style ect its fine I did not feel any difference. If anyting it handles better because I have a better quality shock on the back now.

I agree that if you want to keep the same rake ect you need to lower the front and back.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 02:58 PM
  #4  
Chazmanian's Avatar
Chazmanian
R.I.P. BROTHER
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 6
From: Colorado Springs
Default

I know this is a stretch but its my guess that a fatboy with the 16" front wheel probably wouldnt have that funky oversteer that a 21" wheel bike gets do to the less extreme angles.

The 21" front wheeled bikes do not handle like a fatboy stock. They want to go wide when a fattie turns in. Its amplified even worse if he slams the rear and leaves the front stock and chopperish....I rode mine for a while in choppereque *** down nose up mode for a little while. It dosent suck as bad if you dont know any differently!!
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 03:16 PM
  #5  
klf33's Avatar
klf33
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,796
Likes: 36
From: Toronto, Ontario
Default

Like other posters noted,

I have back 1.5" lowered, front 1" lowered,

I still have enough clearence for some fun in the corners, (a friend on a road star was really getting smaller in my mirrors in the twisties ), when I ride two up it is Ok still (me and my passenger do not cross 350LB combined .

Now, lowering the rear alone should be OK, you will not notice much difference until you get aggressive.

Finally, watch for the upright angle when you park your bike, better park in gear because the kickstand will not get down enough to lock.

With my setup, I can still (was surprised really) slide my jack under the bike for Oil Chances and the likes.

I am thinking of 2" front, it will look great.

I have had 2"+ on the front tubes before, I must admie, I miss the way it was stable on the highway, like a TRAIN , but it was very nervous around town.

I hope this helps.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #6  
JY Kelly's Avatar
JY Kelly
Supporter
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 36
From: Hoboken, NJ
Supporter
Default

2" rear, nothing in front. Perhaps I am not that aggressive a rider, but I don't notice any degredation whatsoever in handling.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 03:46 PM
  #7  
beaureed445's Avatar
beaureed445
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 6
From: Edmond, Ok
Default

Mine is 1.5"- 2" in rear, 1.25" in front.....I have to be careful cornering to the right, so that I don't drag my Fat Cat.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:06 PM
  #8  
20FXST06's Avatar
20FXST06
Road Captain
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Maryland via NC
Default

Lowered mine 2" Front and Rear. Seems to me the the ride and handling is much more responsive. I have had no problems in the curves, but then again I'm no canyon racer either.

 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:12 PM
  #9  
crazybastid83's Avatar
crazybastid83
Banned
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 660
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Default

My wife has a street glide. It is one inch lower in the rear than the other touring models. I lowered the front an inch and I was shockked at how much better it rode. It handled bumps better.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 11:20 PM
  #10  
jkeeton81's Avatar
jkeeton81
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 448
Likes: 1
From: Denver, CO
Default

Thanks for all the info. So do you lose any of the rake when you lower the front?
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Streetbob31
Dyna Glide Models
12
Oct 9, 2014 05:17 PM
HarkinsBG
Softail Models
9
Apr 1, 2013 05:36 PM
Ben E
Touring Models
1
Feb 16, 2012 05:45 AM
thorne310
Softail Models
21
Jun 11, 2010 10:42 AM
Jesse_the_kid
Touring Models
7
Jan 22, 2010 02:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 AM.


Top

© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Follow Us        



When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.