Test rode a few Sportsters today...

Yesterday, I rode a 1973 Sportster that was turned into a really super cool bobber. It was a hardtail and holy hell was it a rough ride. Very, very cool looks and it seemed to run great, but yikes! I can't imagine riding that around. He wanted $3,500 cash. Absolutely loved the looks, but I don't know how to work on bikes and the last thing I want to buy is something that will require alot of maintenance, so I passed.
Today, I went to a dealer I like and test rode a Nightster, 883 Iron, and a Forty-Eight.
I've loved the Nightster looks forever and it was a fun bike for sure. The only upgrade it had was forward controls. I could really feel the power difference when I got on the 883. Love the look of that Iron 883 too, but it had mid controls and no upgrades (plus the power difference bothered me.)
The last bike I rode was a used stock 2010 Forty-Eight. WOW! I absolutely LOVED that bike! It was a blast. The combo of forward controls and solo seat moved back far made it the most comfortable. The aggressive stance of the bike looks freaking awesome too. It was definitely the funnest bike I rode today. I do hate the gay tank graphics, though. It only had 700 miles on it.
I think I may get that Forty-Eight. I was trying to get into something used for $5,000 or so, but I couldn't find anything I liked at that price. It's just regular 'ole Sporters in that price range and I wanted something a little more special (no offense to anyone.)
So yeah... The Forty-Eight won for me! Did these just come out in 2010? What's the general opinion on these bikes? I'm going to search around the forum too, but I have to get ready and head out here shortly. I figured I'd go ahead and start my own thread on it. Don't shoot me!

Chris
Other than that though, the thing looks like a beast. I have had mine now for a few months missing only 5 days of riding due to rain. I love the Nightster. I could probalbly use a little more room to lean, I'm starting to feel the bike out more and hear the scraping from the stand as I hang a left.
Either way, I don't think you can make a mistake with either one .. Congrats (in advance) for the new ride!!
Last edited by madchemist24; Oct 2, 2010 at 05:42 PM.
Trending Topics
Well, the Forty-Eight did very well on the run. I certainly made my best time ever to the peak, grinnin' like a fool as I threw it through the switchbacks. I took time off work and did it on a weekday when there were very few tourists in the way. At the peak, I had to crank the engine for about a second or two before the computer realized, "wow, there's no air up here" and adjusted the mixture accordingly... as opposed to starting immediately like it does at more sane altitudes. Once started, performance didn't suffer a bit.
Bottom line? The Forty-Eight is FUN! The perfect ride for zooming around and raising hell. Those feelers on the footpegs are BEGGING to get ground down to nubs. However, I'm glad it's my second bike. The Sporty would need a lot of customization for long-distance travel and comfort. If you work your way back up to a bagger, don't sell the Forty-Eight! I've always missed my older Sporty since I traded up, and now that I have one again, I'll never be without.
FUUUN!
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
a 2010 Sportster "48' about 2 months
ago and I absolutely love it. It
rides great, has plenty of power
and will outrun my old man's
Fatboy. I took a 265 mile trip last
weekend, got 57 mpg and little or
no fatigue at the end. I say, go
for it..
To answer the question you asked though, the 48 was a mid year entry in 2010.


