When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The Dyno RoomA special room dedicated for Dyno tuning products, troubleshooting and results. All Gearheads and Dyno Operators are welcome here as well as the guys that are new to tuning. Please see the special rules for this section before posting.
I hope not, and that is not where I hope it ends. That said, it is where it has to start. If you do not understand sensors and the limits they have, there is no way you can understand what those limits are and what they cause. The ECM has to live with limits and once you understand them I hope it allows people to understand tuning better, but there is a lot more that has to be covered. To me it's no different than building a house, you start with a good foundation and work you way up from there.
So since I used a MAP sensor as an example, let's look at the specifications for the Delphi MAP sensors. All of the current model sensors have the same error specifications from what I have found but some of the older models are worse. The two attachments show the total output pressure error for Delphi Manifold Absolute Pressure Sensor including error due to linearity, hysteresis and ratiometricity for one chart and the second one shows the the temperature multiplier to the allowable pressure error over the operating temperature range.
As is clearly shown the possible sensor error changes based on the range of the reading. At 20 kPa the possible error is +/- 2.4 kPa. So what this means is the error in the sensor when the ECM thinks its getting 20 kPa may truely be off by +/- 2.4 kPa. Now add to that, the error due to temperature and you can see it just gets a bigger error.
This means the calculations using MAP are going to be effected as the reading may vary by the total error amount from the sensor at any one time. So this means the timing calculations change when you think they should not and the fuel calculations change when you think they should not. This is just the wayit is and there is nothing you can do about it!
I think what is more important is finding out what are issues of those tolerances. What kind of problems do they cause? Are there other tolerances that need to be looked at?
Yes. We can only work within the limitations of the sensors.
For all those in the know, why haven't they developed a nb sensor to cover a broader range. I imagine that some of the major racing circuits like nascar, f1, Indy and others run richer than what our bikes run at. Just curious or is it an EPA type of scenario?
For all those in the know, why haven't they developed a nb sensor to cover a broader range. I imagine that some of the major racing circuits like nascar, f1, Indy and others run richer than what our bikes run at. Just curious or is it an EPA type of scenario?
Isn't that called a wide band sensor? Narrow band get a narrow band. Wide band gets a wide band..
Isn't that called a wide band sensor? Narrow band get a narrow band. Wide band gets a wide band..
Okay, so maybe a better choice of words, a wb type of sensor that works with the speed/accuracy of the narrow band, or maybe a combo system that incorporates both type of sensors?
Because they can't. A wide band is a narrow band with a reference pumping current. That's what allows it to read in a wider range, but the downside is. It takes longer because it has to take the time to deal with the reference. BUT this wideband is still really made to and is the most accurate at stioch. It is capable of reading a wider range, but there is no free lunch.
...and this is only the 4.2. Plenty of other sensors styles on the market, but the 4.2 is what is in this industry for the most part. These are not the sensors that are on cars or what is being used in nascar or F1.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.