When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I suggest that you buy the new $48 part that is needed not the used ebay part your considering looking for.
I suggest that you install the new part and flush the entire system, install new pads and bleed it.
I suggest you don't waste your time writing to the NHTSB and waste your time and theirs about a problem that you are likely responsible for since you don't know what the maintenance was prior to purchasing your 8 year old motorcycle.
I suggest that next time you buy a used motorcycle that you perform a full maintenance on it.. if you would have done that here you probably wouldn't be having the problem AND it would actually be time to do it again.
Nicely put and well said. The only thing I would add is that as DOT4 fluid ages, it naturally absorbs moisture. This moisture in the brake system applies unwanted pressure as the brakes heat up from use ... This isn't a desirable affect. It's important to flush your brake fluid every two years.
I can easily understand accepting responsibility that this malfunction may be related to lack of recommended maintenance but I CAN'T get past the idea that that the failure mode is TOTAL loss of braking, not just loss of ABS protection. The GM ignition switch failure caused only APPARENT loss of braking and steering (both functions could be manually overridden) yet millions of switches are being replaced and millions of dollars are being paid out for law suits. Harley made a big mistake in this design and if it won't revise it perhaps the DOT should exert some pressure. I just can't understand anyone defending an ABS brake system that can cause total brake failure.
I can easily understand accepting responsibility that this malfunction may be related to lack of recommended maintenance but I CAN'T get past the idea that that the failure mode is TOTAL loss of braking, not just loss of ABS protection. The GM ignition switch failure caused only APPARENT loss of braking and steering (both functions could be manually overridden) yet millions of switches are being replaced and millions of dollars are being paid out for law suits. Harley made a big mistake in this design and if it won't revise it perhaps the DOT should exert some pressure. I just can't understand anyone defending an ABS brake system that can cause total brake failure.
Think about this a little more before passing your final judgement...
The brake system on all vehicles is full of single-point failure mechanisms. So in addition to the ABS Module you are now condemning, here's a few more to think about:
- A rapid failure (burst) of a brake line?
- A rapid failure of any seal in the system, i.e., master cyl or caliper.
- Even a mechanical failure to parts such as pads, rotors, pistons, levers, pedals.
There's probably more potential failure mechanisms than I have listed but I think you should get my point. Any of these failures could result in a loss of brake function and none of them have a fail-safe mechanism built into them.
2Black1s, you are quite correct. Brake improvements have been made with redundancy in mind. There are really 2 master cylinders and failure of one hose, master cylinder seal, caliper or wheel cylinder seal won't fail the entire system. Perhaps because the front and rear Harley systems are separate the same thought can be used there. At least to this point no improvement/addition to the braking system has added a possibility for total failure. I still maintain the only possible failure mode for ABS should be a failure of the ABS function, not an added brake failure mode as we seem to have here. No one has talked about this ABS malfunction with linked brakes. I have no theories on that.
2Black1s, you are quite correct. Brake improvements have been made with redundancy in mind. There are really 2 master cylinders and failure of one hose, master cylinder seal, caliper or wheel cylinder seal won't fail the entire system. Perhaps because the front and rear Harley systems are separate the same thought can be used there. At least to this point no improvement/addition to the braking system has added a possibility for total failure. I still maintain the only possible failure mode for ABS should be a failure of the ABS function, not an added brake failure mode as we seem to have here. No one has talked about this ABS malfunction with linked brakes. I have no theories on that.
And you are correct too. At least partially. I think LOL. From what I understand about ABS systems, and I'm certainly not an expert, if a malfunction/failure occurs in the electronic controls of the system, that failure will only result in the loss of ABS function and not a complete loss of brake function. Unfortunately the same cannot be said for a mechanical failure in the system. EXAMPLE: If you have a valve seize in a closed position, when it needs to be open to operate the brakes, how do you design the system to accommodate that?
If it were designed to go into non ABS mode when failed, how long would most be riding and not know there is a brake system failure? Am I understanding this condition correctly that even though there is a failure, that it does not effect both wheels, leaving you with at least 1 wheel for braking?
If it were designed to go into non ABS mode when failed, how long would most be riding and not know there is a brake system failure? Am I understanding this condition correctly that even though there is a failure, that it does not effect both wheels, leaving you with at least 1 wheel for braking?
If there is an electrical failure and the bike goes into a non-ABS mode, then the idiot light comes on - That's how you would know.
As for losing both front and rear brakes at the same time, I don't know of any single failure that could cause that. You have two essentially separate systems, one front, one rear, although I'm not sure that's the case with the newer linked systems.
actually the problem he describes could be related to a couple of different things -- which could be remedied by cracking the connection into the ABS.
Re-read the OP one more time. Cracking the connection allowed the lever to move (eliminating the master cylinder as the problem) BUT that still did not allow pressure to the calipers, hence still NO BRAKES. Again, I have never heard of this happening with a car so their ABS units must be engineered so the hydraulic lock can't happen.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.