When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It wasn't long ago that I posted stating I'd never buy a new Harley, but I've changed my thinking after speaking to some friendly and reasonable dealers. I've priced a 2016 RK in vivid black and a 2017 in Laguna Orange but there's almost a $5000 difference between the out the door prices. Both are basic without security or ABS.
Is the updated 2017 worth $5000 more than last years model? I've never owned a touring bike, so either will suffice, truthfully.
Last edited by Gibler77; Jan 18, 2017 at 07:44 AM.
Reason: Spelling error
I put 34k miles on my 2014 Road King, same bike as the 2016 your looking at. Those bikes are really good bikes. So, Yea if either will suffice then save yourself the cash.
This is a conundrum that will never ever go away! Last year's 'old' stock versus the latest model will always have a price difference. There are significant changes between those two bikes, so it might be worth browsing the H-D website to see the specs and decide if you think the latest is bestest! The paint alone on that '17 is $1,000 more than Vivid Black.
The L orange is half of the difference. So comparing V black 16 to 17 is now $2500. For that dif i would go for the 17. The ride is significantly better plus the more powerful smoother engine rings the bell for me. Since 2014 i've had thee new tourers and there is a.major improvemet in the 17s.
True, removing the Laguna paint pulls $1000 away. So now it's just shy of a $4000 difference. I just realized the financing rate is 0.99% for 2016 touring models, and that makes it pretty close to free to use someone else's money. I'd be financing anyway, and the best rate on '17s is 3.99%, from what I've been told.
I agree that the suspension and motor are big improvements, but upgrading the suspension isn't difficult, and I'm betting a quality aftermarket set up is superior to the stock. Motor doesn't really float boat all that much. The '16 is the high output 103, so it's not like it's a slug.
I'm just thinking out loud. Not disagreeing with anyone's thoughts or deciding in the next hour. The only thing that has me contemplating is the customization I'll be doing to either bike can be paid for with the savings from choosing the older model.
From what you say, then the '16 would be the better buy. Sounds like the dealer is discounting the '16 a bit. Accounts for the difference, as the MSRP are pretty close.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.