Pre M8
I really loved that 05.
After 8K miles on my 19,I'd never go back.
Motor, frame, rear tire, radio and technology...and I'm missing a few.
Yep, I could've kept dumping money into my old ride upgrading all those things.
And while I never look at a pleasure vehicle as an investment...i couldn't dump dollar after dollar into my old bike.
Yes, I had them put the vent in mine...oh the horror.
I felt zero pressure, I simply wanted a bike that had everything I wanted off the showroom floor.
Zero regrets, even as it sits in my garage under a cover for the next few months.
I think the EVO shouldve lasted another 10 years with larger displacement and other various improvements. M8 shouldve come out around 2010. Twin Cam shouldve never came out. But, it didnt happen that way. Simply put....there was nothing wrong with the EVO and it certainly wasnt outclassed.
Twin Cams never really caught on with me. Way too many issues from the get go. Cam bearings and shoe tensioners....they first started the Twin Cam project in 1992. By 1999....shouldve been zero issues.
M8 has its own issues....but my opinion much better than a Twin Cam.
Anyways.....I wouldnt upgrade to an M8 if a person has a paid off Twin Cam. But, if you wrecked the Twin Cam or just felt like spending....buy the M8.
I still ride the EVO.....I dont find new bikes very appealing. Theyve gotten very expensive and very much more complicated...skip the tools, just have a cell phone.
Motorcycles were meant to be simple and not too expensive.....and I think weve gotten too far away from that.
My fleet of four 4x4 Tucks/SUV, Diesel Van, and 2009 Scooter, have all been paid off for many of years.
Still owe a little bit on the house and no credit card debt.
I don't like bills anymore!
YB
She's beautiful and she's paid for.
My fleet of four 4x4 Tucks/SUV, Diesel Van, and 2009 Scooter, have all been paid off for many of years.
Still owe a little bit on the house and no credit card debt.
I don't like bills anymore!
YB
I still ride the EVO.....I don’t find new bikes very appealing. They’ve gotten very expensive and very much more complicated...skip the tools, just have a cell phone.
Motorcycles were meant to be simple and not too expensive.....and I think we’ve gotten too far away from that.
we've been away from that for a very long time.
given your dislike for tc, if you look at an ultra from 1997, pre twin cam, the list price was $16,950. adjusted for inflation, that makes $26,849 today. a new limited will start at $28,699. but look at what all you get compared to what was offered in 1997. so it really isn't that far off, and could be argued that today's bikes are even a better value than 23 years ago.
(and yes, i think they are expensive too..... just offering a different viewpoint)
given your dislike for tc, if you look at an ultra from 1997, pre twin cam, the list price was $16,950. adjusted for inflation, that makes $26,849 today. a new limited will start at $28,699. but look at what all you get compared to what was offered in 1997. so it really isn't that far off, and could be argued that today's bikes are even a better value than 23 years ago.
(and yes, i think they are expensive too..... just offering a different viewpoint)
True the bikes offer so many nice features today. However, when those nice features malfunction....it can be a very expensive repair. Vehicles are the same way....
I do believe their M8 engines are a step in the right direction. A few issues that will eventually get worked out.
Boils down to what a person wants....a DIY and rides regular.....hard to beat an EVO.
If I were to purchase a newer model....it definitely would be an M8.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
P.S. The new fatboy should be called something else, it does not share the lineage, or resemble a Fatboy. Not saying it is not a good bike, just wrongly named.











