When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm still leaning towards the Tranny Fluid Transfer with the new (2017+) M8's and it's new tranny/clutch set up when they first came out, and the touring models with hydro clutches started the transfer but the soft tails with cables didn't. Remember that? A few years into the game, all they did was vent the primary case to stop the pressure differential between the primary and the tranny. Problem masked, but never fixed. What was the big difference between the soft tails and touring that caused the issue to manifest in one but not the other? If they go cable with all of the bikes, problem is nonexistent going forward. Why couldn't the MoCo engineers solve it completely and save the hydros? Who the hell knows........
Not being an *** but how does the way the clutch plates get opened up have to do with fluid transfer.
Is there a difference in the clutch rods or something????
Not being an *** but how does the way the clutch plates get opened up have to do with fluid transfer.
Is there a difference in the clutch rods or something????
Yes, clutch rod was a big part of it. Many many experiments to try something to fix it. ( a million threads in the M8 Section) I owned a 2017 RK right after they came out and gave the MoCo 5 attempts to fix the issue before I made them give me a whole new exact replacement bike. It did it as well along with some other issues. I traded it backwards into a 2014 SGS with 4k miles on it couldn't be happier.
I think a lot of you are forgetting that the hydraulic clutch was a possible cause for the oil transfer problem. Maybe a cable clutch was a way to fix this.
After all the softail models (cable clutch) didn't have the issue.
Maybe the Motor Company was thinking this was better for their customers because
the majority of people change handlebars. Easier to install a cable compared to replacing
hydraulic brake lines and bleeding.
Bars have been changed on 6 of my bikes with Hydraulic clutch. Not much more difficult than changing bars with a cable clutch. You still have Hydraulic brakes to deal with on bar change.
Originally Posted by 09 YELLOWBIRD
What does your answer have to do with what I posted?
ALL I know is that the Hydraulic clutch has been around the Harley scene since at least 2006 on CVO Motorcycles. And MOST FOLKS that had them, Loved them.
Then, the MoCo makes them available on standard models years later and recalls, replacements, and then no longer on new models!
YB
Yep, my last 7 bikes have had the Hydraulic clutch. I do love mine. I feel its a step backwards. Its cost savings in two ways for Harley. One a cable clutch is less expensive to manufacture and install on the building of the bike. Two they now do not have to fix what ever was the problem on some M8's with clutch related oil transfer.
Originally Posted by misfitJason
I think a lot of you are forgetting that the hydraulic clutch was a possible cause for the oil transfer problem. Maybe a cable clutch was a way to fix this.
After all the softail models (cable clutch) didn't have the issue.
Only M8 had oil transfer with Hydraulic clutch. TC never had the issue with Hydraulic clutch. This is the MoCo cost savings, now they do not have to fix the problem, Also much less expensive to manufacture.
I thought it was just a super small percentage of TC's with hydro, like Rushmore's, that had it and nowhere near the amount of fluid transferring that the M8's were having, but transferring nonetheless. Could of happened to cables too, I don't recall hearing that for sure though.
Someone on this forum developed a fix that involved drilling/machining the drain hole behind the secondary actuator... or something like that... The thought was the space behind the secondary actuator was too small/had bad drainage, causing the fluid to build up and be pushed along the trans main shaft, along the clutch rod, to the primary... or something along those lines.
He was able to stop his bad transfer. He actually started offering kits where he had an OEM part machined that would fix the issue... Then the "magic" clutch rod was being offered and he stopped his "fix" production.... the clutch rod was almost as effective, cost much less, and was much less work to install..
Anyways... I bring that up to suggest that the band-aide primary vent, was probably in-lieu of a much more expensive design/manufacturing change to properly and permanently fix the fluid transfer issue.... possibly the vent didn't fix all of the transfer issues and many warranty claims were still being made...
Switching back to a clutch cable killed two birds with one stone: It permanently fixed the fluid transfer issue (or at least made it a cost acceptable warranty issue) and will stop all of the complaints about engagement point and lack of adjustment with the hydraulic clutch...
New M8 customers were oblivious to the fluid transfer issues and the possibility of having a sumping issue or they just didn't care... I'll bet the MoCo is betting on the same response to the loss of the hydraulic clutch...
$tonecold was the guy with "The Fix" that involved machine work. I almost rode up to Reno to have him do it to mine but my bike(s) had MoCo inspecting mine too closely for me to feel comfortable with that. I can't remember the other dude with the modified clutch rod though........
Someone on this forum developed a fix that involved drilling/machining the drain hole behind the secondary actuator... or something like that... The thought was the space behind the secondary actuator was too small/had bad drainage, causing the fluid to build up and be pushed along the trans main shaft, along the clutch rod, to the primary... or something along those lines.
He was able to stop his bad transfer. He actually started offering kits where he had an OEM part machined that would fix the issue... Then the "magic" clutch rod was being offered and he stopped his "fix" production.... the clutch rod was almost as effective, cost much less, and was much less work to install..
Anyways... I bring that up to suggest that the band-aide primary vent, was probably in-lieu of a much more expensive design/manufacturing change to properly and permanently fix the fluid transfer issue.... possibly the vent didn't fix all of the transfer issues and many warranty claims were still being made...
I think the change back to cable is the eliminate more/future warranty costs.
There were several recalls due to potential/actual hydraulic clutch issues/failures. Those costs took a huge bite out of bottom line profits & needed to be mitigated in future product.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.