When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My 2001 Road King has HD Part number 54000114 Premium Adjustable Touring shocks (not air shocks) on it, a previous owner has put them on it.
I noticed they are mounted upside down I believe. The piston part of the shock is on top on both sides, and the shock with the adjustment **** is installed on the right brake side.
From what I've been reading it doesn't matter on these models, and others have them mounted upside down as well. Should I just leave it?
On my 2012 SG, I mount the Progressive Suspension's 944 Ultra Low Shocks upside down as per their addendum instructions. Progressive did give a reason on their addendum instructions, but I do not remember why.
On my 2012 SG, I mount the Progressive Suspension's 944 Ultra Low Shocks upside down as per their addendum instructions. Progressive did give a reason on their addendum instructions, but I do not remember why.
Progressive recommends mounting the shocks upside down with the adjustment at the bottom so they could be adjusted without removing saddlebags.
yes, that is correct. however, they did not recommend putting the left shock on the right and vice versa. they also do not recommend, at all, putting the premium hand adjustable shocks on a bike of that age. that is the older swingarm that has not been beefed up. the premium shocks are basically a mono shock, the right shock does almost nothing. so all the strain is placed on the left side of the swingarm. that can cause some flex, and introduce wobble. are there people doing it and not experiencing that? sure. are there people who are experiencing that? also probably true. i wouldn't chance it. they aren't that good anyway. get some proper shocks that equalize the load across both sides of the swingarm. just my $.02.
"Progressive recommends mounting the shocks upside down with the adjustment at the bottom so they could be adjusted without removing saddlebags." Post 5
This may be the reason.
"Progressive Suspension's 944 Ultra Low Shocks upside down as per their addendum instructions" Post 2
But no reason is stated in the addendum.
My two-cent comment:
In the 1970s decade, we motocrossers mounted rear shocks upside down for performance.
But.... I don't remember why
Less unsprung weight = better performance. If the oil and calving stay with the frame rather than moving up n down with the swing arm, thats less energy for the suspension system to absorb and a faster return to equilibrium for the rear wheel
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.