TMAX vs H-D RACE TUNER
Hmmm I would have to get up to speed on the pro-tuners capabilities, before I could be as gun ho as a few people are on this product. what concerns me on canned software programs would be things like atmospheric(area we live in)conditions that will effect your fuel management. With the T-max you can look at each cylinders fuel ratio and make seperate adjustments per cylinders. Also heat plays a factor on fuel conditions. With the T-max not only is it a closed loop adaptive system, but you can make corrections per cylinder.Does a rear cylinder run hotter normally? Is a richer mixture usually make for a cooler running cylinder? I think Phil you stated that the system was 'arcane' meaning a mysterous secret.....there's nothing mysterous at all about a the 20K bike we are all riding compared to the technoligy that is present with the multi sensors on an automobile. If anything I would say it's archaic, like auto's back in the early 80's when the first computers came out on automobiles (not european). I'm also confused on why alot of people that go with this 103 kits are buying new cylinders vs just having them bored and fitted for the pistons that they are installing? The other factor would be with all this horse power being made.......what about the bottom end? When did HD make the change in their sprocket shaft bearing, I believe it was in 2003? Anyone considering updating it for the extra HP? I think anyone that understands cam durations etc. has someone that can run a flow bench and understands what the customer is trying to obtain ......can put a package together for about 2000.00 plus labor that will put you in the 100/100 plus HP club on pump gas. There are alot of good products that are out there.
I have been running a DTT TCFI-IID for a long time. I have personally installed at least 6 and helped with installs, setup, and troubleshooting of dozens across the counrty. I have a reasonably decent understaning of how and why it works, as well as some of the shortcomings... Probably no where near as well as you, but "decent" nonetheless. I understand, like, and prefer closed-loop systems. In fact, when you couple a ProTuner with a SERT, you endup with closed loop dynamic tuning of AFR ~ similar to the TMax / DTT.
In the context of the ProTuner, when someone says "they give you a MAP", that means that HQ provides a SERT MAP for your specific HQ build. This is particularly good for getting timing very close to optimal. Then, the ProTuner dynamically tunes in the A/F Ratio. It is not like a static "canned PCIII MAP".
I agree with you on the bottom end thing. It was 2003 when the MoCo moved away from the Timken bearings and I belive the cranks have changes at least a couple times. While it is certainly debatable, the current rask of runout /bearing / crank issues likely has far less to do with the bearing change than it does to crank quality (sissoring). You can do Timken conversions all day long, but if the cranks still twist and create excessive runout, there is no bearing on earth that will withstand it. The bearing failures are much more symptomatic than root cause.
I had no problem with my 98" motor that made well over 100/100. It's a 2005 and crank runout was .0025 when I dis-assembled it for the upgrade I'm doing now. Some fail some don't, which is true for stock and modified motors. Am I taking all precautions with the new build? HellYes.... Timken conversion, new Jims crank: split apart,balanced, reassembled, and welded before it is ever installed.
Guess I'll ask Santa for
Hmmm I would have to get up to speed on the pro-tuners capabilities, before I could be as gun ho as a few people are on this product. what concerns me on canned software programs would be things like atmospheric(area we live in)conditions that will effect your fuel management. With the T-max you can look at each cylinders fuel ratio and make seperate adjustments per cylinders. Also heat plays a factor on fuel conditions. With the T-max not only is it a closed loop adaptive system, but you can make corrections per cylinder.Does a rear cylinder run hotter normally? Is a richer mixture usually make for a cooler running cylinder? I think Phil you stated that the system was 'arcane' meaning a mysterous secret.....there's nothing mysterous at all about a the 20K bike we are all riding compared to the technoligy that is present with the multi sensors on an automobile. If anything I would say it's archaic, like auto's back in the early 80's when the first computers came out on automobiles (not european). I'm also confused on why alot of people that go with this 103 kits are buying new cylinders vs just having them bored and fitted for the pistons that they are installing? The other factor would be with all this horse power being made.......what about the bottom end? When did HD make the change in their sprocket shaft bearing, I believe it was in 2003? Anyone considering updating it for the extra HP? I think anyone that understands cam durations etc. has someone that can run a flow bench and understands what the customer is trying to obtain ......can put a package together for about 2000.00 plus labor that will put you in the 100/100 plus HP club on pump gas. There are alot of good products that are out there.
Does the pro tuner use the stock 02 sensors or change to wide band?
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I don't see much about it on here, but I have been running S&S VFI for 5 years now. With the addition of Closed Loop, it works fine for me.
[IMG]local://upfiles/18192/1098F9F6C5FC46DCBE3FDB0E8C14F164.jpg[/IMG]




