96" Cam Only
Not exactly designed as a bolt in/stock CR cam...54H (.555 Hi-lift)...for 96/103 engines CR up to 10:1
By the way Etrader, thats a real nice looking SE Ultra in your sig.
SB
Call up HQ or any speed shop for that matter and ask them. If your doing the work yourself it is worth the $ to just do the cams. I think you'll be surprised at the change in character.
[/align]
On a stock 96" Andrews 26 would be ideal. Might as well wait until you build the motor, then choose your cam.
I've seen at least one chart on the TW6, but its TQ peak was also too high. Again, this is my preference, and YMMV--but I feel a touring bike should be cammed for best low-end grunt, as it will likely never be used to compete on the dragstrip. Jamie at Fuel Moto may try some cam experiments on his '07 RK next Spring, and I told him to keep me informed if he runs across anything interesting. I think the cam mfrs. will be producing 96-specific cams in the near future, if they haven't started already, and it's just a matter of time. In the meantime I'm very happy with the performance of this setup and may never do a cam upgrade.
My first thought was the TW6 based on suggestions from some folks with many more 'smarts' than I have, but then the 'committee' in my head starts yapping and the confusion sets in! The dyno on it looks good and I can play around with the exhaust if I end up with a big dip in the tq. I can do the work, long as one of my more serious wrench buds has time to 'babysit' me, I'm more of an Evo/Carb guy and it's been quite a few years since I've done much wrenching. Need someone to smack my hand when it gets in the wrong place!
Next, gears vs chain? How good is the roller chain setup? Any one had probs with it? Appreciate all the feedback, thanks guys
Next, gears vs chain? How good is the roller chain setup? Any one had probs with it? Appreciate all the feedback, thanks guys
SB
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I have no idea what the peak HP & TQ numbers are on my bike nor do I care.
Does anyone really ride there?
I don't.
My bike runs like a raped ape or scalded dog, or what ever other example you use in the RPM range I usually ride.
That is 1000 to 4000.
It is one pulling SOB.
By the way Wood was in my top three.
After that it's all cruising.
Just because it can't be said enough, Thanks Philm and Dalton.
http://groups.msn.com/harleytechtalk...59352534940643 I think we have a clear winner!
My first thought was the TW6 based on suggestions from some folks with many more 'smarts' than I have, but then the 'committee' in my head starts yapping and the confusion sets in! The dyno on it looks good and I can play around with the exhaust if I end up with a big dip in the tq. I can do the work, long as one of my more serious wrench buds has time to 'babysit' me, I'm more of an Evo/Carb guy and it's been quite a few years since I've done much wrenching. Need someone to smack my hand when it gets in the wrong place!
Next, gears vs chain? How good is the roller chain setup? Any one had probs with it? Appreciate all the feedback, thanks guys
As for gears vs. chain, I would stick with the chains. From what I've heard the new chain setup is superior to their predecessor, and going that route would be less expensive. If I thought there would be any issues resolved by gears I would of course select that option.






