When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I believe that if I were shopping for cams, the first thing I would worry about is how they perform and the last thing that I would worry about is how the bike sounds at idle....Just sayin'.
To each his own but I'm happy with the performance I have. Like the poster of this thread, I would spend the money just to get the sound as long as I don't have to lose my bottom end torque.
I believe that if I were shopping for cams, the first thing I would worry about is how they perform and the last thing that I would worry about is how the bike sounds at idle....Just sayin'.
The SE grinds perform quite well, in fact I removed my Andrews 54H in favor of the fun factor of the SE-258.
Dyno charts are great, but having a FUN motorcycle is also great.
I believe that if I were shopping for cams, the first thing I would worry about is how they perform and the last thing that I would worry about is how the bike sounds at idle....Just sayin'.
I chose the cams/rocker combo for my bike because of the performance. The nasty idle is just a dividend. If we were all about performance first, not many of us would be riding Harleys, anyway.
The 255 bikes don't sound nearly as nasty as the 204 or 211 bikes.
Here's what comp cams says about their automotive "Thumpr" cams:
The reason that the new Thumpr™ Camshafts have such an aggressive exhaust note is that the lobe profiles and grind characteristics chosen by the COMP CamsŽ engineers produce a combination of early exhaust valve opening, long exhaust duration and a generous amount of intake and exhaust overlap to maximize the rough-idling characteristics of the cams without negatively impacting the power output or streetability.
We're not building bikes (or hot rods) just for the performance. We spend just as much time on how they look as how they perform. We buy exhaust partly for performance and partly for the sound. It's about having a great performing bike that also looks and sounds great. It's about having a complete package.
I also think that, (for some of us greybeards anyway) it's about trying to get our bikes to sound like a Harley. The best sounding bike I ever had was a shovel with drag pipes. No way could it keep up with my current ride, but it sure sounded sweet.
I chose the cams/rocker combo for my bike because of the performance. The nasty idle is just a dividend.
.
I think the above pretty much summed up what I was trying to say...IMO, a cam swap should be based on performance, not sound.
Yep, I've known a guy or two that went with too large of a cam, bolted it and did nothing else. She sure sounded good sitting there at an idle, but ran like crap. But like said before, to each his own.
I chose the cams/rocker combo for my bike because of the performance. The nasty idle is just a dividend. If we were all about performance first, not many of us would be riding Harleys, anyway.
The 255 bikes don't sound nearly as nasty as the 204 or 211 bikes.
Here's what comp cams says about their automotive "Thumpr" cams:
The reason that the new Thumpr Camshafts have such an aggressive exhaust note is that the lobe profiles and grind characteristics chosen by the COMP CamsŽ engineers produce a combination of early exhaust valve opening, long exhaust duration and a generous amount of intake and exhaust overlap to maximize the rough-idling characteristics of the cams without negatively impacting the power output or streetability.
We're not building bikes (or hot rods) just for the performance. We spend just as much time on how they look as how they perform. We buy exhaust partly for performance and partly for the sound. It's about having a great performing bike that also looks and sounds great. It's about having a complete package.
I also think that, (for some of us greybeards anyway) it's about trying to get our bikes to sound like a Harley. The best sounding bike I ever had was a shovel with drag pipes. No way could it keep up with my current ride, but it sure sounded sweet.
quick question since I am researching cams....you had posted " the lobe profiles and grind characteristics chosen by the COMP CamsŽ engineers produce a combination of early exhaust valve opening"
doesnt the early exhaust valve opening produce low end torque as opposed to a later opening? Does the SE204 perform well 2000-5500 w/o any other mod?
I don`t know where you leave,but don`t use Doc Slicks in Sugar Hill ,Ga. he will screw up you engine. He`ll put the push rods in backwards. Rumor is he his several law suits.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.