When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Please show me where I said we need any kind of laws. You can't because I never said it. Learn how to read. I did however suggest that if there is a law then perhaps it should be followed. My unsafe activities are not an issue here, I didn't post them on the world wide web. I'm still curious what makes you so special that laws don't apply to you.
Let's make a deal here. I'll learn how to read, and you learn how to think for yourself and keep your liberal nanny state opinions to yourself. And I still think you are a dickwad! WTF makes you think your unsafe activities are any less of an issue than mine? Are you some kind of phucking royalty? My whole point is that WE ALL DO things that others may consider "UNSAFE". I like to jump out of airplanes and take my grandkids for hot-air balloon rides. These are not things that we NEED to do, but I certainly do not want any laws on the books banning these activities. I like riding my bikes WITHOUT a helmet on my head. I like riding in my car with no seatbelt. Maybe you like a nice game of softball now and then. Softball ain't a safe game. You could get injured playing it. Maybe we need a law to protect you from possible injuries (or even death) that you could sustain playing softball. Face it - living is risky and every human being should have the right to determine the amount of risk they are comfortable with. EVEN the "IDIOTS" you think you need to protect should have the right to do something that COULD BE RISKY. The simple fact that a law was passed to "PROTECT" me does not mean I need to roll over and BE PROTECTED!
Laws are made because someone, somewhere is going to make money off of it. Do you really think that a politician seeks office thinking, I want to make life really miserable for [fill in the blank with your forum name here].
Personal safety laws almost always start out with something truly tragic happening, usually to some 18-year old kid who had their whole life in front of them. It then becomes the crusade of that victim's family to never have another parent go through the hell that they experienced. They easily get the sympathy of the majority of people and of law makers. At this point there's blood in the water and the sharks can smell it and figure they can make a buck off of an enacted law and of course some of the money they make then goes to support reelection efforts for the elected official who supports such a law.
If you think the politicians are after you personally, you're deluded.
The politicians have been bought by the insurance "special interest" groups, and some of you have obviously fallen for their propaganda. Stay the hell out of my life.
They easily get the sympathy of the majority of people and of law makers. At this point there's blood in the water and the sharks can smell it and figure they can make a buck off of an enacted law and of course some of the money they make then goes to support reelection efforts for the elected official who supports such a law.
If you think the politicians are after you personally, you're deluded.
And there it is.....
If you think that the helmet laws in your area are unfair, you are in the minority.
And until your ideals, and thoughts are in the MAJORITY, you lose and have to suck it up.
Once you have enough people that agree with you, GO FIGHT THE LAW.
LAWS HAVE BEEN CHANGED IN THE PAST, AND THEY WILL BE CHANGED IN THE FUTURE.
Until then stop saying that us that choose to follow the law presently are sheepish. I have stood up about gun laws, and will stand up about gun laws. And those that I cannot help to change, I follow until we can change them.
I dont carry open anymore, because I am tired of wating my time fighting it and getting thrown out of court. I also havent had enough support, therefore have been in the Minority.
Fortunately, I live in a state where I can choose to wear a helmet or not. I choose to wear one but I believe you should have the right to choose not to. A helmet may not save you but statistically it increases your odds. Thats why I wear it. Again my choice. I don't want my choices legislated for me. I would go without a helmet before wearing a novelty helmet but that's just me. Lots of the states with helmet laws tag you for not having a dot helmet.
Sorry for your loss. Since you brought it up, what kind of helmets were they? How old were the helmets? Was cause of death from head injury? Arguing against the safety of helmets is stupid, period. Might as have well petition all racing sanctioning bodies.
You were the one who made the statement " helmet = no vegetable/minor injury/walk away". All I did was point out the obvious flaw in your statement. But, since you asked, one was brand new this year and the other was purchased in '05 when he bought his motorcycle.
I am not arguing the safety of helmets, I am arguing the right to make a decision without it be legislated upon me. If all of you "pro helmet" advocates are so sincere in your convictions, how many of you wear only a full face helmet? The superior protection of a full face over a half or 3/4 helmet is well documented. If your choice is all about the safety of a helmet then the clear cut choice in head gear should be a full face and only a full face.
FWIW...... If or when the state of IL mandates a helmet law then I will wear one. It will only be a Snell approved full face variety. If you're going to do something, why do it half helmeted aka...half a$$ed.
Yeah, whatever pal, as much as I would like to spend some time arguing your points, I've learned a long time ago you can't win an argument with a rock, not saying you're a rock of course, just that solid gray matter inside your skull appears to be maybe ...... granite?
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.