When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
i am an experienced touring rider, decided to buy a new HD, either an RKC or a Softail Deluxe. Two different animals, I know. I am kinda moving away from huge tourers, and I'd like to end up with either of these bikes. Not a big fan of the Heritage Softail Classic, so not a choice for me.
I have just ridden an Electra Glide Classic 1500 miles and liked it, but after owning a GL1800 Gold Wing and a BMW K1200LT, I'm kind of inclined to avoid another huge bike. I used to own an RKC, had oil leak problems so I sold it. All my HD experience is therefore on the touring models, with the rubber mounted motor and the touring frame.
I've never ridden a softail, but I love the looks of the Deluxe. I know it doesn't have the ground clearance of the RKC, but I'm curious how different the bike will "feel" from the touring models. I hear mixed things - that the Softail Deluxe is basically a "bar bike", nowhere near as comfortable as an RKC, won't handle or stop as well. Then other people say that the Softail is more versatile than the RKC, and feels smaller (no bags and sits lower.)
I will probably use the bike mostly for light touring (4 hour rides) and the occasional weekend trip (300 milers). I know the RKC can do this with ease - has anybody ridden both the Softail Deluxe and the RKC, who can provide some thoughts?
My brain tells me RKC (bags, windshield, dual front discs, cruise, same money) but my heart says Softail Deluxe...
I just got rid of my Softail Deluxe to buy a Road King. But I'm also planning on cross country trips, not just 4-hour jaunts.
A properly dressed up Deluxe can be a fantastic tour bike, especially if you're going alone. And it is hand's down, IMHO, the most beautiful bike Harley has ever produced. The only thing I didn't like about it was the buzziness of the 88b engine at running speeds (I couldn't get over how nice the rubber mounted engines rode in comparison; that's why I got rid of mine and got the RK). If you've only ever ridden Harley tour bikes, you need to take a Softail for a test ride before making up your mind. There's a big difference between the rubber mounted engine of the RK, and the counterbalanced engine on the Softail. I didn't like it, but some people prefer it (or there wouldn't be NEARLY so many Heritages on the road.) The other nice thing about the Deluxe is that it's an easy bike to ride. From the moment I sat on mine, I felt like I had been riding that bike my whole life. I've never felt that way about any other bike; there's always had to be a learning period.
Again, I'd take a Softail for a spin. If you don't mind the engine buzziness, go get you a Deluxe!
Oh, and by the way, I took my Deluxe from Kansas City to Sturgis last year, and the bike did just fine. Did great in corners, never bottomed out, and never once wanted for more bag room on the bike.
thanks! i am thinking now of maybe expanding my choices to the Street Glide also (although it seems pretty similar to the EG standard but for more money)
i'm surprised that the ground clearance was not an issue with the Deluxe, I always grind the pegs on cruisers. I do love the rubber mounted engine bike's "feel".
My feelings on these two bikes would lean towards the RK favorably. The ride is better,the suspension is definately better especially 2 up on long trips. I think you fill find that the handeling on thr RK is better and the bike in general is a bit more comfortable than the softail. The rake on the front of the RK makes it a better handeling bike around town also.
Why not try to rent the two bikes you mention for a short haul to asses the diferences between them?
thanks! i am thinking now of maybe expanding my choices to the Street Glide also (although it seems pretty similar to the EG standard but for more money)
Iâm currently undecided between the RK Classic and the Street Glide myself. I took a few minutes and made a little list of the differences I see between the EG standard and the Street Glide. Honestly to me the black and chrome engine along with the radio make the money difference a mute point. But there are a hand full of other differences that make the Street Glide a more attractive bike to me over the standard.
-Radio
-Cool Rear fender
-Low license plate mount
-Bullet style turn signals
-RK Custom style floorboards and brake pad
-Black and CHROME engine
-Color matched saddlebag latches
-Chrome dash plate (Same as CVO models)
-Clean front fender
-Slotted cast wheels with black accents
-Lowered suspension
-Standard with all instrument gauges
-Chrome trim rings on all instrument gauges
-Fairing mounted mirrors
-Low smoked windshield
-Low profile seat
I really like the Street Glide. You can bet they will allow you a detachable tour pack too...that will let you do more and more when it comes to longer distances while keeping your cleaned look. If I were in the market, I would be looking hard at the Street Glide and the Electra Glide Classic...
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.