Bagger wobble exposed!
Ed
First, I must get the bike in tip top shape and I've noticed through some research that the original tires (Dunlop 407F) which were replaced by the factory are still on the bike. Even though the bike is an '09 and the guy I purchased it from only put 1500 miles on it, I would think they (Harley/Dunlop) would still want to put the new tire on this for free, no?
I'm waiting on my jack to arrive and will perform the service as to get it into tip top shape and then see where we stand with the wobble.
Much reading to do.
I went with the Throttle Up brace which is quite a bit cheaper.
https://www.hdforums.com/forum/evo-c...le-issues.html
Thanks to GRBrown for the time making this thread.
Last edited by Joe_G; Nov 19, 2013 at 08:45 AM.
Can anyone who as installed the Progressive unit can tell me if it's an easy/hard job?
Eric, no it's not hard, takes about 20 minutes to install it.
The main reason I removed it is because the drive belt is riding on the inside of the rear sprocket, causing an annoying squeak. I think, and I could be wrong, that the touring link has caused a misalignment in the engine and threw out the tracking of the belt.
The rear of the engine is mounted in rubber mounts, I think the link puts lateral pressure on those mounts throwing out alignment.
Anyone else notice these things after using a progressive link?
I have 39k on the bike now. Is this something the true-Track would fix or is a bushing worn somewhere?
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I have 39k on the bike now. Is this something the true-Track would fix or is a bushing worn somewhere?
Once you have checked those and put anything right, a T-T kit will certainly enhance your riding experience!
[The engine and trans are bolted together, and the swingarm is mounted directly onto the rear of the trans. Along with the rear wheel this makes up a substantial single Assembly, which is mounted into the frame at three points, of which more shortly. The swingarm axle not only allows the rear wheel to move relative to the rest of the bike, but doubles up as part of the rear mounting.]
When I read this I am trying to figure out why???
My first guess is that the Engineers did the best they could to Avoid lengthening the frame or wheel base and did not have room to mount the rear swing arm directly to the frame.
So... they took the Risk with rider safety.
My Common sense says mount swing arms, steering and wheels to solid metal. The engine and transmission mounted by solid rubber makes sense as long as nothing else _Suspension, Steering) is mounted to those two pieces.
4 wheel vehicles have their axles (housing or mounts) mounted to frame somewhere and usually Welded, Wheels are mounted to axles etc... no rubber between wheel and frame on auto's, AND they have 4 corners. Motorcycles with one wheel front and rear should Never have Rubber anywhere between the Wheel - Steering - or Swing Arm!!
Whatever the Engineers reasons they have put Riders at High Risk for Accident. Two wheels have their own risk for riding as it is.
MHO






