When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Do you think there is any merit to bracing the frame at all, e.g. the later baggers have a light brace across the front downtubes?
Or do you think the frame is rigid enough to cope? I know your experience is "don't worry about it Graham" and I am sure you are right.
I'm going off to measure the free play on my pivot ... it certainly rattles and I remember Hillside (?) saying they re-machine theirs to a fine tolerance or running fit.
Without doing analysis of the frame and it's rigidity, I cannot honestly or accurately say either way. About the closest I can come to giving an answer is to say I've yet to find a frame on any bike that I thought was too rigid.
Check again.... The FXR has an additional crossmember that would make a significant difference to the rigidity of the frame.
Yup, I've wondered about that. IT has a cross member under the engine/transmission ... but it is to brace or just to attach the jiffy stand too? (Honest question).
The later baggers also have a brace across the front downtubes and a larger plate at the rear where the center fitting stabilizers attach.
Yup, I've wondered about that. IT has a cross member under the engine/transmission ... but it is to brace or just to attach the jiffy stand too? (Honest question).
The later baggers also have a brace across the front downtubes and a larger plate at the rear where the center fitting stabilizers attach.
It mounts the mid controls and centre stand. It is much more substantial than the rear crossmember.
It would be an interesting exercise to get a bike that "wobbles" and fit a crossmember where the FXR has one and see if this has an effect. The solution to all these problems may just be a bolt in brace on the frame where the FXR has one (and they don't wobble!)
Does the rear stabilizer prevent twisting along with side to side motion?
No, the top stabiliser between the heads does that. However motion arising from the lack of a stabiliser, say in a fast bend, may well feel strange in all manner of ways!
The late baggers have the whole rear section boxed in where the FXR has an oil tank..
Bottom side both have cross braces that keep the frame from spreading and act as a sheer panel. FXR might be a little wider there..
So the FXR has a different frame stiffness to the baggers near tbe rear mount. The centre crossmember helps tie in the bottom frame tubes with a boxed section not just a thin flat plate with single line of weld as at the baggers have at the rear.
One way to check the frame stiffness in this area is ondo the bolts that hold the rear mount plates in place untill you have lost the preload. Take an accurate measurement of accross the frame then bolt the plates up again to see if it has spread the frame at all when the preload comes back on again.
Last edited by 4_stroke; Aug 18, 2014 at 01:40 PM.
The FXR and Touring frames are similar, but not the same, the FXR is more compact. So with or without additional bracing they are going to behave differently and have different degrees of stiffness.
It mounts the mid controls and centre stand. It is much more substantial than the rear crossmember.
It would be an interesting exercise to get a bike that "wobbles" and fit a crossmember where the FXR has one and see if this has an effect. The solution to all these problems may just be a bolt in brace on the frame where the FXR has one (and they don't wobble!)
Mid controls mount to the side tubes not the cross members.. Not sure it make much diffference in stiffness as it is a smaller box and it is pretty far from the swing arm pivot.. I know a guy that claimed it helped keep the frame from pinching there... Not sure I believe that..
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.