When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My 07 (96)now has a little over 80,000 miles. I'm ready to pull the cord and do an upgrade to the 103. I'm going to have my local HD do the work, have a lot of trust in them. I currently have SE255 cams and happy with them. I was considering SE204's but I don't think the dealer has done many of them and from reading the forum, the 204's can be a touchy tune. They will also do a mild port with larger valves to add more air. I have some quesions. I want to keep this bike forever - I'm 66 and put 15-20K miles on a year, so want reliability and longevity.
1. The dealer has recommended welding the crank. Since I want the bike to run a long time, should I have them rebuild/balance at the same time? The dealer will also check things like cluch and starter at the same time to determine if they need replaced.
2. I have about 45K on my cams. Should I get a new or slightly used set of SE 255's and replace now?
3. Anything else I should be looking at so that I have a good 100K miles of non issues ahead of me? (They replaced a transmission bearing last year)
Thanks so far. Yes, I am going to do the complete kit rather than bore my old cylinders... not that much difference in cost and with the high mileage, may as well go all new.
Any thoughts on the SE204 vs staying with SE 255s? Same cost unless I can get a pair off a CVO. I think I like the SE 204 but from all the comments, it wants a lower compression and is sensitive to heat, which means it would always need high octane. I do a lot of touring and normally get high test, but there have been times I've had to put 89 in depending on where I'm at.
I would consider re-using your old cylinders because they are used, or 'seasoned' therefor better than new.
Like you, I run 20,000 miles a year and constantly "tour" in those rpm ranges. The 103 is the same as my older 95. Same cylinders and pistons. The difference is in your longer stroke, So I recommend the Andrews 26's. Low intake duration and the bike pulls from 2000 strong all the way past 5,000. I suspect like me you never get past 4,000 most of the time. I'm thrilled with my choice.
Because it's a Dealer job, they may insist on HD cams. 255 cam is similar to my 26's with an even lower intake duration. 254's are almost the same.
204 is more mid range. Think about where you ride most on the time.
As "Stiggy" says ... I would consider re-using your old cylinders because they are used, or 'seasoned' therefor better than new. Absolutely nothing wrong with using the old cylinders ... they are/will be more stable ... and you'll save a couple of bucks ... just find a good machine shop and use torque plates ... Good Luck with your build Brother!
Thanks on the suggestion to reuse my cylinders. I'll talk to HD and get an estimate. That way they could wait until they get the pistons in and measure for a better fit before boring the old cylinders.
Got the bike back a couple of weeks ago. Wow, does it ride nice. They dynoed right away and I got great results! I attribute this to the 204 cams, 103 upgrade, 1.725 rockers, the Kromeworks Power Tune header and of course my tuner. TQ curve kicks in strong about 2500 and is flat to 5000 rpms: 115 TQ and 101 HP.
So, in addition to the above changes, they replaced the drive belt and sprokets, compensator with the SE compensator, hydraulic lifters, diaphram spring with SE, manual CRs and some minor parts. When they sent the flywheels out to get balanced and welded, the flywheels were to far out of tolerance so they replaced with new (still within budget). Finally, when they had it apart, they found I had again blown the main transmission bearing (this went out last year and they replaced, so the new one only had 15K miles on it!).
So with the problems they found, I'm glad I didn't wait another 20K to do this work and besides, now I can enjoy a "new" bike.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.