When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
When I took the Ride Like a Pro class the last exercise of the day was to come to a complete stop, put your left foot down, right foot on the brake and make a 90 degree right-hand turn within a 6' lane. The concept was to make a hard turn at an intersection without going into the opposing lane. It was a lot harder than I thought
I should correct a previous statement I made concerning Neil Harris' Motor Lessons booklet. On page 3 he actually states one should "usually" stop with left foot down and right covering brake, but adds that road conditions can dictate switching which is up and which is down. He does, however, state that one should "never" have both feet down and lists a few reasons - rider safety being the predominate one.
Good catch on the Florida "stop" definition, lo 1. Who'da thought they would put a definition under "definitions"?!?
So far I haven't found a single state that requires even one foot touch the ground, only that all forward motion cease - applied equally to all types of vehicles; California, Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, N & S Dakota, Virginia, W Virginia, KY, TN... nothing so far. Also came across some sections of Pat Hahn's "Motorcyclist's Legal Handbook" which also lists several States as "No" for "feet down" statutes and none (that I could see) as "yes". I may have to pick up a copy.
Interestingly enough, most of the state "handbooks" I also perused mention to look for slick spots before "you put your foot down to stop or park." Shortly thereafter they say to "consider letting your feet skim across the surface" at a very slow speed if you find yourself on a slippery surface. Pretty much quoted verbatim in each manual.
Last edited by basselope; May 16, 2013 at 08:47 PM.
I got pulled over for not putting my feet down at a stop sign. Technically, I didn't exactly come to a full stop. He just gave me a polite lesson about the legality of rolling stops and let me go.
Exactly why should we cover the rear brake ? If someone hits you from behind, no braking action is going to affect the outcome in my opinion. In fact you may be better off letting the bike absorb some of the impact rather than get flung through his windshield. I prefer both feet on the ground so I can drive forward quickly if I see a rear collision coming... you cant reliably take off with the bike partially leaned to the left. I will grant, it is quicker to dismount with one foot on the ground though,.
If you're rear-ended, I guarantee you will release the brake before it makes much of a difference! I suspect the transfer of energy from the car to you will be pretty similar and you'll go sailing off in either case.
I'm a one footer (left) at most stops, as I'm in the habit of holding the bike with the back brake on hills, etc.
I put both feet down if I'm coming to a complete stop....which I often don't. The bike is too heavy with all the luggage and two up to sit there with only my left leg holding it up (somewhere around 1300 lbs, I figure). Like the above poster; I have a hard time believing any rear brake action is going to make much difference if you're rear-ended. I keep the front on just to stop the bike from moving.
Rear brake is covered to allow the right hand better control of the throttle. We are taught basic guidelines to develop good habits that work in most situations. However, I've been in a couple situations where I had to put the right foot down and hold the bike with the front brake and then use the throttle to move up the hill from a stop. Since then I practice using different brakes for different techneques so I'm not cuaght off guard next time. Even slipping the clutch just enough to hold the bike still while at a stop on a steep slope is an acceptable techneque. So I was told by a motorcop. Don't get use to only one techneque, practice them all.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.