What Cam
Road Warrior
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 7
From: Wisconsin
Lots of good choices here. I put the TW-222 in my bike for the same reasons the OP stated. Attached is the dyno chart if that helps. The peaky torque curve is really a function of the exhaust and not necessarily the cam. A 2-1-2 exhaust would stretch out the torque curve a bit.
For a drop in cam and performance below 4500 rpm this combo is tough to beat.
Good luck with your choice.
For a drop in cam and performance below 4500 rpm this combo is tough to beat.
Good luck with your choice.
Last edited by equandt; Apr 5, 2014 at 01:54 PM.
As tuners go (I have tried TMax, Power Commander V, EMS, and now PV), I would go with the Power Vision by Dynojet. It is easy to use, reasonable priced ($419.95 from Direct Cycle Parts or $499.00 from Fuel Moto http://www.fuelmotousa.com/10201493.html - they have promo right now, throwing in the handlebar mount and visor), and you can do the basic auto-tune with your stock O2 sensors. It also has really good support from Dynojet and if you buy from Fuel Moto you get their support which is outstanding and an extra year of warranty. No matter what you might decide to do in the future the PV will support it. So it doesn't matter which cams you go with (my 1st choice the TW-222's from Wood, but they are more expensive or my 2nd choice the 57's from Andrews) Dynojet or FM will have a map that is really close and you don't have to use a laptop, it can all be done with the PV on the bike.
Last edited by $tonecold; Apr 5, 2014 at 09:29 PM.
Road Warrior
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 37
From: Monroe, Louisiana
Lots of good choices here. I put the TW-222 in my bike for the same reasons the OP stated. Attached is the dyno chart if that helps. The peaky torque curve is really a function of the exhaust and not necessarily the cam. A 2-1-2 exhaust would stretch out the torque curve a bit.
For a drop in cam and performance below 4500 rpm this combo is tough to beat.
Good luck with your choice.
For a drop in cam and performance below 4500 rpm this combo is tough to beat.
Good luck with your choice.
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by equandt View Post
Lots of good choices here. I put the TW-222 in my bike for the same reasons the OP stated. Attached is the dyno chart if that helps. The peaky torque curve is really a function of the exhaust and not necessarily the cam. A 2-1-2 exhaust would stretch out the torque curve a bit.
For a drop in cam and performance below 4500 rpm this combo is tough to beat.
Good luck with your choice.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post