When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Replaced my stock '10 Comp with the SE comp at around 15k miles. With the 255 cams and the occasional hard start it sounded horrible when it bumped over and didn't start.
Turning the bike off now with 27k miles I hear the occasional "clunk,clunk,clunk" down there.
Changed out the Amsoil Super shift (NEVER USE THIS CRAP) with Formula + this weekend and pulled a fair amount of metal from the drain plug.
The supershift basically eliminated the friction zone. It was enganged or it wasn't. Formula+ makes it so much easier to shift properly.
With those numbers maybe you should think about going back to the stock comp.
Interestingly enough, I've never had a stock one fail. Lucky I guess.
Now that I say that, the one I have now will self destruct.
lp
Believe me I've thought about it!
I did some checking on line, it doesn't appear that the original compensator 40296-06A is still available. I've had good service from mine with 40K+ miles on it, but I did do a complete engine tear down at 13K and when I reassembled I torqued the compensator to spec and used red Loctite. I also use Redline primary oil which is synthetic. Maybe some, all, or none of these things account for the longevity of my compensator. The thing that gets me is I don't remember this being a problem before 2006, so why don't they just go back to that design? Seems if you had something that worked and you go to something that doesn't the cure would be to go back to the thing that worked.
I did some checking on line, it doesn't appear that the original compensator 40296-06A is still available. I've had good service from mine with 40K+ miles on it, but I did do a complete engine tear down at 13K and when I reassembled I torqued the compensator to spec and used red Loctite. I also use Redline primary oil which is synthetic. Maybe some, all, or none of these things account for the longevity of my compensator. The thing that gets me is I don't remember this being a problem before 2006, so why don't they just go back to that design? Seems if you had something that worked and you go to something that doesn't the cure would be to go back to the thing that worked.
I agree, guess they don't make enough money on what works!
With 60K miles on my 09 Ultra, I have had no issues with my compensator. I think these failures are directly related to the right hand. IMO ?
Nope. The '09s (and a couple years following) have been problematic. I get 18-20,000 miles out of a rear tire, so you'll find few people that are more mellow and easy riding than me
Prior to the '09s you'd never hardly even hear of a compensator discussed on this forum. In '09 they made a "change" to it and it was just a bad design period. Numerous upgrades have been done to it since. We can only hope the last one "got it right".
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.