Torque comparison
Now I have a 2012 FLHTCUTG w/103" stock cams, V&H power headpipe , RC components 4" mufflers and SE heavy breather intake.
If the 2008 weighed 1320 lb with me and the wife fully loaded and it made 98 fp. and the 2012 Tri weighed 1570 lb with me and the wife fully loaded, does the 2012 TRI have to make 116 fp torque to pull as well as the 2008?
I think mathematically it does but I don't know how the 30tooth front/70 tooth rear sprocket on the 2012 TRI vs the 32tooth front/68 tooth rear sprocket on the 2008 impacts things.
Thanks
Last edited by Moneywoes; Apr 13, 2013 at 08:38 PM.
I've talked to a builder that suggest a genisis 577 cam, .030 headgasket, deck the heads to bring CR to 10:1-10:2 and tune with TTS. He says this is about a 95hp 110torque set up on a 103" FLH. Can't dyno the TRI, so he'd have to tune off off the laptop and data logging while riding it.
Would a setup that produced 95hp and 110 torque on a FLH with a 32/68 final produce more torque on a TRI with a 30/70 final?
I don't care about the HP, thats to high in the power band. His genisis 577 cam is 100+ at 23-2400, thats usable where you need it on a TRI.
Last edited by Moneywoes; Apr 13, 2013 at 08:37 PM.
I've talked to a builder that suggest a genisis 577 cam, .030 headgasket, deck the heads to bring CR to 10:1-10:2 and tune with TTS. He says this is about a 95hp 110torque set up on a 103" FLH. Can't dyno the TRI, so he'd have to tune off off the laptop and data logging while riding it.
Would a setup that produced 95hp and 110 torque on a FLH with a 32/68 final produce more torque on a TRI with a 30/70 final?
I don't care about the HP, thats to high in the power band. His genisis 577 cam is 100+ at 23-2400, thats usable where you need it on a TRI.
You obviously spoke with Steve @ GMR about his cams. Steve is very good at what he does and his Genesis 577 cam is a winner. Without your trike on a dyno you wont see what your final output will be.
I had a 117" in my trike and it dyno'ed at 115ft lbs of torque from 2500 to 4500 rpms. This was with a Wood TW7h cams and compression set at 10.25. I could pull out and pass at will in 6th gear.
Now Im building a 124" that should pull like a bigger freight train
This I understand. I don't really care what the numbers are for numbers sake, but I would like the TRI to pull at least as well as the 103" 255's, SERT Rinehart TD's SE intake 32/68 pulley set in the 2008 FLHTCU did.
Just don't know if adding the TTS, Genisis 577's and setting CR to 10.2:1 to the current V&H power duals/RC components 4" mufflers, SE heavy breather will do it.
"I had a 117" in my trike and it dyno'ed at 115ft lbs of torque from 2500 to 4500 rpms. This was with a Wood TW7h cams and compression set at 10.25. I could pull out and pass at will in 6th gear.
Now Im building a 124" that should pull like a bigger freight train"
You don't mess around do ya....
Yes, Steves new shop in Fort Worth is only about 15 or so miles from me.
Thanks
Last edited by Moneywoes; Apr 13, 2013 at 09:46 PM.
After my flywheels went south I wanted to build a engine with more torque. I stepped up to a 117" with the same stroke but bigger bore. Definitely way more pulling power. 2 years later I developed piston slap due to poor cylinder bore from the manufacture.
So now Im building a bigger engine to get more torque so I can roll with my buddies in any situation.
" More torque to haul the pork!! " LOL
Trending Topics
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
My 117" in my trike averaged the same fuel mileage as most Triglides.



