Fortifying horizontal fairing brackets
Back in 2008 I started a thread about modifying and fixing the vertical brackets and approached it like Terrabella did only with less finesse and attention to cosmetic detail, to say the least. My green left-side repair made from a piece of metal flower-bed edging speaks for itself, but both sides have held now for almost three years. Here are links to those threads and one more, the last being Fabrik8r's rather ambitious project that I think you will agree would guarantee an improvement in structural rigidity. With his solution I believe the fairing would survive a direct hit with an anti-tank weapon.
Terrabella's thread
My old thread
Fabrik8r's battle-ready solution
Anyway, back to today's project. Many of us have added larger and/or heavier speakers and this stresses the already marginal brackets on the bike, so I thought adding another one to the top of the speaker could help relieve some of the stress on the stock horizontal bracket. I bought a strip of 1/2"W x 1/8"-thick steel from Home Depot for <$4 and proceeded to hack, hammer, grind, and drill it into submission. I pride myself in the exercise of crude jury-rigging techniques. I didn't go with aluminum because I wasn't sure if it would hold-up well.
The results were two brackets that fit better than they had a right to considering the lack of precision given to the procedure. I used screws with extra length to equal the thread depth of the old ones, as the bracket material is 1/8" thick and I also added washers. The speaker threads are plastic and the upper-vertical fairing bracket are brass, and I thought going short on the bolt threads might cause trouble down the road. The stock upper vertical bracket bolts are 1/4" x 20 x 5/8"L Allen socket-head and I substituted a 1/4" x 20 x 3/4"L with 7/16" hex head. The speakers used small machine screws and I just used some I had in the parts bin that were a bit longer.
Anyway, one thing for sure is that it does feel sturdy, so we'll see how long these flimsy HD horizontal brackets last now. A quick ride afterward indicated that the fairing doesn't shake as much now, or at least such is my perception.
Last edited by iclick; Jul 23, 2011 at 05:24 PM.
Last edited by iclick; Jul 25, 2011 at 12:33 PM.
Yes meant to to fail.
Instead of addressing the front end shake ( improved motor mounts) could the MoCo have designed the brackets to flex and eventually break rather than have them hold to the inner fairing so tightly that the mounting points on the inner fairing would vibrate so bad that they would fail there with a much more costly repair needed?
Personally I beefed up a broken bracket a few years back and the mounting tab on the inner fairing holding the brass threaded insert eventually broke off completely.
I ended up having to replace the inner fairing and replaced the brackets with newer style ones and almost immediately replaced the front motor mount with one from http://www.glide-pro.com/ .
The improved motor mount took a great deal out of the front end shake that vibrated up thru the handlebars and upper forks and into my fairing.
Just something to think about:
If the inner fairing is shaken, which point will take the most stress and what might the results be?
Trending Topics
The '07-'08 bikes shake more than any other modern Harley that I know of at idle. The 96" is more of a shaker than previous TC's, and in '09 they re-engineered the motor mounts. These control shaking at idle much better, but based on the bikes I've ridden I also think vibration is greater at speed.
The improved motor mount took a great deal out of the front end shake that vibrated up thru the handlebars and upper forks and into my fairing.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
My problem is with the design of the factory motor mount. Intact or not I feel it can be improved as shown by several other companies attempts with alternate designs.
The outer fairing has the openings but all the brass inserts to tie the two fairings together reside on the inner one where all the shaking starts.
As stated it is all just a theory at this point and up for discussion.
P.S. Forgot to the thank the OP for the original thread. Very informative and helpful!
Last edited by Primo; Apr 10, 2012 at 01:10 PM.




