Almost done
Here it is... Now I just need some nice pictures on the northern Mississippi River valley. I love those Dynas.
[IMG]local://upfiles/45969/764A41B497F2437999E09F6281FCD7FB.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/45969/F92B5A229B734E0CBDC9755DF6836D47.jpg[/IMG]
Is there a big difference all through the rpm range??
More top end??
Details on the motor work please...
First step, the cam - I chose an SE-251. This is a high-lift, short overlap cam thus would be more of a torque cam.
Second, the compression ratio - I needed to up the compression to take advantage of the cam. I chose to run SE Flat Top pistons for 10:1 compression. I could have done 10.5:1, but 10:1 seemed like the magic point where a tank of sub-grade gas wouldn't turn the bike into a ping monster. These were for 95" jugs, thus new cylinders were also added.
Third, the heads - I chose the SE Performance (MCR) heads and added the compression releases.
Fourth, the exhaust - V&H Pro Pipes. It took me a while to come to grips with a 2-1 pipe, though I'd have lost too much low-end torque with the short-shots that were one the bike when I bought it.
Fifth, the supporting components - I probably overbuild the engine, but it was apart, and I wanted reliability so; SE lifters, perfect fit pushrods, SE roller rockers, and an SE clutch kit.
I had the SERT and Stage I on the bike when I bought it so this is also a part of the build though I didn't have to add this.
St. Paul Harley will likely use this as a reference build. I did deviate from their usual high-output builds. What I really like about the bike is the fact I have power riding two-up from idle to hitting the rev limiter. When you roll on the throttle I can take it from 0-60 without shifting out of 1st. Once I get on the highway at the 70-80 mph range, the harmonics of the engine and exhaust settle down nicely and the bike is an incredibly smooth ride, but barks and pulls with a small snap of the throttle.
If I could do it again, would I -- HELL YEAH! When/if I get a bagger (I'm saving that for when I'm old <grin>
I might avoid as high of a lift of cam, but this is just what I wanted on my Dyna.Let me know if you have any other questions.
I think the2 into 1 was the best choice - performance wise. Did you put cones in?? Wonder if your build guy thinks they add anything...
Also heads have any port / chamber work - website??
Compression release?? Is that an extra plug hole on one cyl just for starting?? Seems 10:1 wouldn't need it.
Any plans to add a 6th gear??
Sorry for all the questions - but this is the (type) build I'm planning - Stump puller...
Thanks dd
Trending Topics
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I didn't add cones, though I can swap the baffle with the V&H competition baffle. These pipes, with the higher compression engine, are loud enough. I'm fortunate the one of my neighbors I ride with and the other (retired) is an old hot-rodder, so they like the sound. the bike barks when I open the throttle up.
---Also heads have any port / chamber work - website??
No additional head work ... yet <grin>.
---Compression release?? Is that an extra plug hole on one cyl just for starting?? Seems 10:1 wouldn't need it.
It was less than $50 to add the manual compression releases. I know I didn't "need" them on 10:1, but I can tell the difference when I hot-start the bike using the releases vs. not using them.
---Any plans to add a 6th gear??
I have the sickness... I'm already looking at the SE 6-speed. Please don't tell my wife :-D
---Sorry for all the questions - but this is the (type) build I'm planning - Stump puller...
No problem... that's what I got, a real stump puller. I am taking it out with the guys I ride with on Sunday. This will be my first time out with a group since I finished the build and 500 mile break-in. I'm looking forward to some throttle play.
I will post charts once I get them. Both I and St. Paul HD, who did the build are extremely curious in the numbers as this seems like a really solid performing high-output engine build.
cheers.






