fxd vs fxr
#21
#23
1992 FXR - 608 lbs.
http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/har...glide_1992.php
1992 Electra Glide Ultra Classic - 749 lbs.
http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/har...assic_1992.php
2012
Ultra Classic Electra Glide - 889 lbs.
FatBob - 706 lbs.
Nightster - 562 lbs.
FXR - Superior Frame, Engine mounting, Carb, and lighter weight
2012 Dynas - Better brakes, TwinCam, EFI, and bigger forks
#25
If you are talking about the FXRS then compare it to the brakes on the FXDF, FXDX, or FXDXT. The current FXDF has dual front brakes and 5 more brake pistons on the bike.
Last edited by icecaps; 11-30-2011 at 07:25 PM.
#26
#27
#28
Not everyone knows how wonderful an FXR is. Some of the market rejected it, thinking it looked too much like a Japanese bike. Even today, there are probably only a relative handful of us who fully appreciate them. Yours is a real beauty. Makes me wish I still had mine.
#29
-snip-Not everyone knows how wonderful an FXR is. Some of the market rejected it, thinking it looked too much like a Japanese bike. Even today, there are probably only a relative handful of us who fully appreciate them. Yours is a real beauty. Makes me wish I still had mine.
Ya know, I sold a previous FXR, years ago and regretted it later. So it goes. Now I have one again. The circle of bike life. There out there if you want one. Everybody should ride what they like, whatever model it is.
Thanks again.
#30
So, the ultiamte fantasy ride for the few of us on this thread would have to be a 120R motor in an FXR frame with some aluminum/composite bits; it would easily beat 550lbs; what an awsome performer that would be and I mean performance of the Harley kind; massive torque from idle on up and that true sound and feel that can only come from the real thing.....the "other" kinds of performance are readily available and serviced with metric wrenches.....