Switchback = Road Queen?
So I was just reading another post about the switchback in the dyna section and the salesman for the HD dealer said that someone with a smaller frame that could not handle the Road King is the target market for this bike.
So it's smaller than a RK, it's got smaller lockable hardbags than the RK, but with the Dyna frame it's actually a nice bike for a woman.
So, does that beg to differ that the nickname would be Road Queen?
I know I have seen shift linkages with that name, so I am not making it up, but is it a better fit on the Switch than on a RK that happens to be owned by a woman?
I am not trying to start some war between the Dyna and Touring section, I am actually interested in speculation if that was HD's motivation or target market behind the design?
Let's think about it for a moment: same size motor with 90 lbs less GVW than the Road King ... (i.e., better power-to-weight ratio) that's an especially important feature for the lasses (NOT) ... like the Sportster ....
I volunteered elsewhere the MoCo should have given it the letter designation STFU ....
I'll readily admit the Switchback name is a rather weak m o n i k e r .... Think the MoCo could've done much better in coming up with a name ....
If you can't tell ... I am a fan of the new model (if not of H-D's job of naming it) ... I don't understand all of the hate ....
R/
'Chop
Last edited by SURFOR Chop; Aug 19, 2011 at 03:12 PM. Reason: Why would the site edit out the word m o n i k e r ...??
(Please don't Hate on Me , I ride a Dyna too)
The new bike fits market share why bash the company for a bike that will sell. I'm sure the company held focus groups and had a marketing plan before the design team started the project. Otherwise the bean-counters wouldn't approve the project even to go into the design stage. I think the company used it's resources wisely given today's business climate. If the Switchback doesnt sell the company will discontinue it in short order. Seems like the Rocker and Cross Bones didn't last too long.
Not every rider has the physical size or experience to handle a full size bike. So why not make a smaller tour bike?
Stop the name calling and let everyone enjoy the size bike that they handle.
Last edited by Chicago Ken; Aug 19, 2011 at 04:11 PM.
Let's think about it for a moment: same size motor with 90 lbs less GVW than the Road King ... (i.e., better power-to-weight ratio) that's an especially important feature for the lasses (NOT) ... like the Sportster ....
I volunteered elsewhere the MoCo should have given it the letter designation STFU ....
I'll readily admit the Switchback name is a rather weak mo****r .... Think the MoCo could've done much better in coming up with a name ....
If you can't tell ... I am a fan of the new model (if not of H-D's job of naming it) ... I don't understand all of the hate ....
R/
'Chop
Gonna be a lot of Road "King", and Glide owners red faced when enough SBs hit the street and they get left behind at the traffic light. Gonna be an awesome bike.
What was HD's motivation? Probably enough notice that people liked the lightweight, agile, powerful, dyna family of bikes and were trying to tour on them. And it's not the first time the MOCO has done this kind of thing. I think it'll sell better than those earlier examples.
Fuel Capacity 4.7 gal. vs. 6 gal.
Weight, As Shipped 696 lb. vs. 775 lb.
Weight, In Running Order 718 lb. vs. 812 lb.
Numbers are all very close
Trending Topics
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
There you go, straight from the horses mouth on CNBC.
And when I was there, the salesmen were referring to it as the mini-Road King. Of course difference in ride and comfort I am sure are huge so calling it a Road Queen probably wouldn't fly, since they aren't in the same category.
Last edited by June Bug; Aug 19, 2011 at 04:15 PM.







