When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Engine Mechanical TopicsDiscussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.
I didn't list the 255 because, isn't that what I basically have now?
Yes; I missed the model year in your OP. That year did offer the HO103 and the cams had a very similar profile to the 255, so you are correct; not much to be gained. But the other cams referenced in my last post would provide a measurable difference in performance; the TTS cams will wake that puppy up.
I honestly expected a better turn out for this poll. I also didn't see the Andrews 48 doing as well as it is. I thought most would side with Woods. Don't get me wrong, I love Andrews, and from what I know, they play a major roll in grinding other manufacturers cams. The TTS-100 and Cyclerama's 555 is where I lean, because they give more room for growth, while still working well in stock configuration. I also like the 222's and 555's. But, I love how inexpensive the Andrews are.
I honestly expected a better turn out for this poll. I also didn't see the Andrews 48 doing as well as it is. I thought most would side with Woods. Don't get me wrong, I love Andrews, and from what I know, they play a major roll in grinding other manufacturers cams. The TTS-100 and Cyclerama's 555 is where I lean, because they give more room for growth, while still working well in stock configuration. I also like the 222's and 555's. But, I love how inexpensive the Andrews are.
Define "room for growth"; not sure I agree on the concept of selecting a cam and assuming it will work just as well in a more modified configuration. I subscribe to the "select the cam and build around it" formula.
Define "room for growth"; not sure I agree on the concept of selecting a cam and assuming it will work just as well in a more modified configuration. I subscribe to the "select the cam and build around it" formula.
Define "room for growth"; not sure I agree on the concept of selecting a cam and assuming it will work just as well in a more modified configuration. I subscribe to the "select the cam and build around it" formula.
I would suggest that there are some cams that can very successfully be built around in stages. The CR575 is a good example, it's a pretty solid upgrade as a bolt in for a 103. Add ported heads, compression, and more cubic inches in just about any order or combination and it just keeps getting better and better. For a bolt in cam only with no other planned upgrades, there are obviously better choices though, the 570 coming handily to mind.
Disclaimer: Obviously there are a lot of cams out there that this strategy will NOT work well with. Let the buyer beware.....
Trying to decide if I want to just do the cams, (222's) or do FM 107" kit. I know how you guys will side, but, I'm on a limited budget, cause I want to do other things. ie.) wheels and rear CVO fender. All choices are stupid expensive! That's why, I wanted to future proof the cam choice. I'm leaning towards just the cams, cause all I really want, is more power upon take off. The 222's promise to deliver exactly what I want. I see that my poll is favoring the Andrews. Don't get me wrong, I like Andrews. My '03 Road King had a 95" big bore and Andrews 26's, and that thing was a beast! Why is everyone siding with the 48's over the Trip. 2's? Cost? Performance? Or, a little of both? If both were the same price, which one then?
Another question I have, and it's kind of important, do I need adjustable push rods and roller tappets? Or will the stock ones be fine? In other words, what else do I need to buy for just doing cams?
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.