When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Ha...I joined the Marines when I was 17....and was doing stuff much more dangerous than riding a motorcycle. You're a legal adult at 18, and I think that is the age when you should be able to make your own choices and live with the consequences or benefits.
When it's your time, it's your time. If it's not your time, carry on. Regardless of how old you are. I don't believe in government playing the part of big brother.
I wonder if we would be having this debate if the subject was "texting while driving" . Some government is necessary. Seat belts have proven to save thousands of lives. I remember lots of people raising hell when that law went in affect.
Ha...I joined the Marines when I was 17....and was doing stuff much more dangerous than riding a motorcycle. You're a legal adult at 18, and I think that is the age when you should be able to make your own choices and live with the consequences or benefits.
When it's your time, it's your time. If it's not your time, carry on. Regardless of how old you are. I don't believe in government playing the part of big brother.
Some government is necessary. Seat belts have proven to save thousands of lives. I remember lots of people raising hell when that law went in affect.
you can always make an argument that "something will save lives". The question is, how much freedom are you willing to give up? Soon you won't even be able to buy a motorcycle without ABS even though you specifically do not want that on your motorcycle nor are you willing to pay for it. Tough ****. If it saves "one" life...
I'm sorry but I don't buy it because it will never end with these people. If they had their way all you will be able to buy is a battery powered motorcycle.
you can always make an argument that "something will save lives". The question is, how much freedom are you willing to give up? Soon you won't even be able to buy a motorcycle without ABS even though you specifically do not want that on your motorcycle nor are you willing to pay for it. Tough ****. If it saves "one" life...
I'm sorry but I don't buy it because it will never end with these people. If they had their way all you will be able to buy is a battery powered motorcycle.
Amen. Seems as tho some have forgotten about "A government by the people for the people". We had a revolution because of a tyranical government. We formed a limited government. We now are facing another ruling government. They say it is for our own good and safety. No thanks.
IL doesn't require you wear a helmet, but get caught without your seatbelt and you are going down! Doesn't make a damn bit of sense. There is no doubt that helmets save lives, same as seatbelts. Personally I think both should be personal choice. As far as 18 vs 21, 18 is to immature for anything. Even to vote IMHO. Some of these kids today are way out of touch with reality. Military service excepted as most reach a degree of maturity and responsibility. Fire away.
I wonder if we would be having this debate if the subject was "texting while driving" . Some government is necessary. Seat belts have proven to save thousands of lives. I remember lots of people raising hell when that law went in affect.
The laws about texting when driving, DUI, etc are about protecting innocent people who have no choice about their safety, do to other people choosing to put them in harms way by driving distracted or drunk.
Helmet and seat belt laws, for adults, only "protect" the single person in that situation. I cannot harm others by not wearing a seat belt or a helmet. Only myself. I have lost my freedom to choose. That is an infringement on my personal freedom and my pursuit of happiness.
Protecting the population from itself in such a manner is the first step towards a controlled population. When you are controlled by others, you are not free.
Remember when you couldn't wait to get out of Mom and Dad's house so you could do want you want? Welcome to Big Brother's house. IMO
Motorcycles are not a necessity so why not make them illegal all together? Is it not safer to take public transportation or drive a Volvo. Funny to me how people are so quick to take others freedoms (to protect them) while they smoke a cigarette, stuffing their face until they need medical intervention all the while telling others how to prolong their life!
The laws about texting when driving, DUI, etc are about protecting innocent people who have no choice about their safety, do to other people choosing to put them in harms way by driving distracted or drunk.
Helmet and seat belt laws, for adults, only "protect" the single person in that situation. I cannot harm others by not wearing a seat belt or a helmet. Only myself. I have lost my freedom to choose. That is an infringement on my personal freedom and my pursuit of happiness.
Protecting the population from itself in such a manner is the first step towards a controlled population. When you are controlled by others, you are not free.
Remember when you couldn't wait to get out of Mom and Dad's house so you could do want you want? Welcome to Big Brother's house. IMO
Any of those increase the chance of the responsible individual causing harm to someone else through their careless, stupid, selfish actions. Again every argument to the contrary is ignorant, this is coming from a guy who has a DUI conviction, my drinking and driving in my youth could have easily cost someone else their life. I'm fortunate it didn't. For that reason I believe it's right for a government of the people to nip stupidity in the bud. I believe the motto to serve and protect means something, keeping some selfish ***** i.e. me drunk/distracted and in control of a 6000lb pickup truck, from driving and risking the life of someone else just going about their business is just and proper.
Keeping me from risking my own life where it would goes no one else physical harm is tyrannical and a sign of a totalitarian regime.
Keeping me from risking my own life where it would goes no one else physical harm is tyrannical and a sign of a totalitarian regime.
This makes perfect sense. But one thing most people don't seem to understand in helmet debates is that a crash/head injury, unfortunately, doesn't mean instant death. Some, probably most, times it 'merely' results in a person living their life at a reduced, sometimes severely reduced, capacity. The 'risk' to one's life is far greater then death.
Unfortunately, or perhaps fortunately, this is something difficult/impossible to understand until you actually experience it. Or at least have personal experience tending to someone that has experienced this. I have never seen statistics, or studies of any kind, regarding the 'lives' of people that haven't died immediately after receiving a head injury. Probably because it would involve years of studying how a persons life turned out. And it is somewhat subjective in nature.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.