When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The first step in diagnosing a riding problem, is diagnosis, which starts with establishing a starting point. Hence I asked what her level of training was, so that I would know how to help her.
Crashing is not part of learning how to ride a motorcycle.
There are a multitude of ways to insult a person without even once calling them a name and I am fluent in most of them, but in your case i'm going to make an exception and just say it. You're a goddamn idiot.
And no one asked you to be an *******, but you're one anyway.
This guy is an *******, I mentioned that in another post. Maybe bi-polar as well as he seems to cuddle up to some and lash out at others for no apparent reason either way. He did admit he knew he was an ******* so there's that..
He apologized later in the thread wherein I called him out, as he's done again in THIS thread. I think it may be helpful for him to stay off the computer (or at least this forum) if he's had a bad day at work or whatever.
As far as his religious references, Jesus Christ had some pretty bad days and I don't recall him taking it out on the crowd at Golgotha.
in reality it is very unlikely that anyone would ever learn how to become a good motorcycle rider without some form of competent formal rider training. I can recommend some training resources if you'd like...
????
Many of us learned to ride, and became "a good motorcycle rider", long before there was any such thing as "competent formal rider training". There are steps that make the process easier, and more effective, but they aren't "formal rider training".
I learned to write computer programs in college with "formal training" but I didn't become a good programmer/analyst until getting some actual experience. I just don't want any beginners to attach too much significance, ability, to "competent formal rider training".
Many of us learned to ride, and became "a good motorcycle rider", long before there was any such thing as "competent formal rider training".
Well, if you truly are a good motorcycle rider, and you got that way in the absence of competent formal rider training, then that would make you extremely unusual.
There are steps that make the process easier, and more effective, but they aren't "formal rider training".
And what "steps" are you referring to, specifically?
I learned to write computer programs in college with "formal training" but I didn't become a good programmer/analyst until getting some actual experience.
So if you had never obtained any formal training in computer programming, how likely is it that you would have ever just "figured out" on your own and become a good programmer?
I just don't want any beginners to attach too much significance, ability, to "competent formal rider training".
I get tired of seeing motorcyclists who thought they were "good riders", dying for lack of competent formal rider training. Human life has great value, and we each have a responsibility to be a good steward of it.
Saw this quote on another tread and thought it was fitting for this post....
Whenever I hear someone explain how "they had to lay it down (drop their motorcycle) to avoid a crash," I want to smack their empty skull and listen to it ring like a Chinese gong.
I don't know where someone would ever get the silly idea that intentionally "laying down" an upright motorcycle is some kind of defensive manoeuvrer. Yet, there are some "riders" who persist in thinking it is!
The coefficient of friction of a rubber tire against the road surface is off the charts when compared with steel, or chrome, or plastic against the road. End of story. And, No: You can't ride your downed motorcycle to safety like some magic carpet.
What about swerving?
The MSF Basic Rider Course practical exam covers swerving. You ride directly toward the instructor. At the last moment, the instructor points to one side or the other. If you swerve in that direction, you get ten points. If you swerve in the WRONG direction, you still get eight points. If you fail to swerve, you fail the course. The MSF does not teach you how to "lay it down." The "swerve-ability" of an downed motorcycle is zilch!
How about braking?
Even if you are unavoidably about to collide with an object -- a bridge abutment, oncoming car, tree, etc. -- doesn't it make more sense keep on the brakes, slowing your forward speed, until the very end?
Let's put this "laying it down" crap to rest. It ain't "old school" and it never was. It ranks right up there with: "I ride better after a few drinks", "helmets are for sissys" and "I only use my rear brake". Ugh!
Saw this quote on another tread and thought it was fitting for this post....
A-freekin-men, brother.
Heck, I'm gonna quote it here myself:
Whenever I hear someone explain how "they had to lay it down (drop their motorcycle) to avoid a crash," I want to smack their empty skull and listen to it ring like a Chinese gong.
I don't know where someone would ever get the silly idea that intentionally "laying down" an upright motorcycle is some kind of defensive manoeuvrer. Yet, there are some "riders" who persist in thinking it is!
The coefficient of friction of a rubber tire against the road surface is off the charts when compared with steel, or chrome, or plastic against the road. End of story. And, No: You can't ride your downed motorcycle to safety like some magic carpet.
What about swerving?
The MSF Basic Rider Course practical exam covers swerving. You ride directly toward the instructor. At the last moment, the instructor points to one side or the other. If you swerve in that direction, you get ten points. If you swerve in the WRONG direction, you still get eight points. If you fail to swerve, you fail the course. The MSF does not teach you how to "lay it down." The "swerve-ability" of an downed motorcycle is zilch!
How about braking?
Even if you are unavoidably about to collide with an object -- a bridge abutment, oncoming car, tree, etc. -- doesn't it make more sense keep on the brakes, slowing your forward speed, until the very end?
Let's put this "laying it down" crap to rest. It ain't "old school" and it never was. It ranks right up there with: "I ride better after a few drinks", "helmets are for sissys" and "I only use my rear brake". Ugh!
Motorcyclists who don't know how to ride, make up that old lie after they crash, because they have no flipping idea what they did wrong to cause themselves to crash.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.