already dropped it
Sounds like the bike took the brunt of the damage. All new riders should start off riding a safe used bike with some love marks on it.
Sounds like you made it farther than this guy before dropping your new harley...
Last edited by RET_SCPO; Sep 11, 2018 at 02:07 PM.
And what "steps" are you referring to, specifically?
So if you had never obtained any formal training in computer programming, how likely is it that you would have ever just "figured out" on your own and become a good programmer?
I get tired of seeing motorcyclists who thought they were "good riders", dying for lack of competent formal rider training. Human life has great value, and we each have a responsibility to be a good steward of it.
Formal training? I have seen the classes at a HD dealer and at the community college. I watched the exercises and saw the instructors speaking with class members but I never saw a cage on the course or any hazard that a rider faces in daily riding. There is a huge difference between seeing an orange cone that needs to be avoided and an unexpected, moving, obstacle.
I get tired of speaking with new riders that assume having passed a class means they are fully prepared to face what they are attempting. No I couldn't have written a computer program without taking a class first. But I equate the things I learned in college with telling a new rider "this is the clutch, throttle, brake, etc."
Last edited by rjg883c; Sep 11, 2018 at 06:40 PM.
It is critically important to understand the difference between becoming a good rider, and simply avoiding the laws of statistical probability over time. They have absolutely nothing to do with each other. I encounter motorcyclists all the time, who've been "riding" for 50 years, but don't even know which way to push the handlebars to get the motorcycle to turn in the direction intended. The only reason they're alive, is because no one has killed them yet. They have no role in their own survival.
And learning has almost nothing to do with the size or the power of the motorcycle that someone learns on. My Hayabusa was my first street motorcycle, and my learning curve was pretty much a vertical line.
I get tired of speaking with new riders that assume having passed a class means they are fully prepared to face what they are attempting. No I couldn't have written a computer program without taking a class first. But I equate the things I learned in college with telling a new rider "this is the clutch, throttle, brake, etc."
It is critically important to understand the difference between becoming a good rider, and simply avoiding the laws of statistical probability over time. They have absolutely nothing to do with each other. I encounter motorcyclists all the time, who've been "riding" for 50 years, but don't even know which way to push the handlebars to get the motorcycle to turn in the direction intended. The only reason they're alive, is because no one has killed them yet. They have no role in their own survival.
And learning has almost nothing to do with the size or the power of the motorcycle that someone learns on. My Hayabusa was my first street motorcycle, and my learning curve was pretty much a vertical line.
Those classes that you're seeing, are just the tip of the iceberg in terms of rider training- the "Kindergarten" of rider training. Those classes are for taking people who've never been on a motorcycle before, and getting them qualified to operate an asthmatic air-cooled 2-valve pushrod-operated mini-chopper with bias-ply tires in an empty parking lot. Those basic classes are in NO WAY the "end" of one's rider training. There are MAGNITUDES of formal education beyond that.
Do you really believe riders that haven't been formally trained are only alive because "no one has killed them yet. They have no role in their own survival"?
Or a better question is how do you assess that someone is a 'good rider'? Is it really that important to be able to explain "don't even know which way to push the handlebars to get the motorcycle to turn in the direction intended", even know the name of the action(terminology), or being able to ride? Is that really how you determine who is a good rider, because they have taken a class?
And as far as motorcycle size, I was referring to the fact that a smaller, lighter and less powerful, motorcycle is easier for as new rider to control, And not as likely to scare a new rider and end their riding 'career' before it gets started. At least that is what I've seen over the last 50 years.
That is why learning on a dirt bike is nice, the crashes don't hurt as much and are easier to survive.
Last edited by ChickinOnaChain; Sep 22, 2018 at 04:48 PM. Reason: Multiple posts
Fast forward several years (without riding) I had a friend who was selling his bike for financial reasons so I bought it to help him out and so I could get back on two wheels. Being older and wiser I figured this time around I would take an MSF class. Best damn thing I ever did. The class isn't designed to make anyone an expert rider but as anyone who has taken the rider courses will tell you, the classes teach you the basic riding fundamentals that would take years to learn without being shown proper technique. I wonder how many riders out there who've never taken a class can do a figure 8 inside of a 20 foot box? Some would ask why that's an important skill to have and it's not about being able to control a bike in a 20 foot box, It's about having complete control of your motorcycle. The skills a new rider learns during a riders course are vital to long term success out on the road. It's all about knowing how to make your motorcycle do exactly what you need it to do when you need it to do it.
I am a much better rider in my second carnation of riding then during my first thanks to formal training. I found the training so advantageous that I ended up taking several more to include the advanced riders course and was eventually asked to be an MSF instructor, which I declined.
The question of whether or not a person with no formal training can ever be an expert rider is difficult to answer. I do believe that it would take a lot longer for a person with no formal training to master the skills taught in rider skills and fundamental courses. This was well proven watching riders with years of experience having to take the mandatory rider courses when I was still on active duty. I never met a rider who took one of the courses who said they didn't learn anything and who didn't enhance their skills. I've seen many "experienced riders struggle to maneuver their bikes through many of the slow maneuvering exercises.
Most states I know of have so much faith in the MSF program that they even give you your endorsement after successfully completing a class. There's a reason for that.
Last edited by RET_SCPO; Sep 12, 2018 at 11:39 AM.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
*this of course doesn't apply to Trikes













