When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
This is what I have been wondering as well. Football helmets have this, just look at quarterback helmets, big field of vision.
One thing I didn't like about this study was the rider was on a fixed position with a 130 degree horizontal view. That won't give a ride a full 180 degree side to side peripheral view. I think that would have been a more useful test. It's a start but the report is a little weak for me. I wrote a paper in grad schedule about helmet laws and though the paper always comments on whether the rider had a helmet or not, the lack of helmet may not have been the cause of death. Potentially the rider had their femoral artery cut when the bike fell on them and they bleed out. Maybe the rider was blunt force trauma to the chest but their head was completely fine. The motorcycle statistics don't do a good job of breaking out the cause of death, just that there was a death.
Reminds me of NHTSA/Claybrook days. Data cited accidents with fatal head injuries, ignoring when the same victims also had other fatal injuries. Too many studies have implicit premises that invalidate the conclusions they claim.
Reminds me of NHTSA/Claybrook days. Data cited accidents with fatal head injuries, ignoring when the same victims also had other fatal injuries. Too many studies have implicit premises that invalidate the conclusions they claim.
The most important statistic, IMO, is never reported and can never be known. That is how many incidents occur after which the rider can get up and walk away instead of being taken to a hospital. Or a morgue.
If this study is true, then I guess someone (maybe the OP) needs to design a better FF helmet that will not limit your Field Of View, but still be "safer" than a half or 3/4 helmet.
Of course, we have to also question whether the rider in the FF helmet COULD have been "distracted", by music/phone/etc., that MIGHT have contributed to the accident, right?
Call me cynical if you want, but it seems that almost every "study" has certain criteria, but they don't always take into account EVERY detail, and they tend to "omit" other details, so that they can somewhat "skew" the results to look the way they WANT them to. I tend to want to look at WHO is commissioning the study, WHY they want the study, WHAT are they looking FOR (what is the goal of the study supposed to show; i.e. what do they WANT it to say), and HOW and WHERE are they getting the data. Those factors will usually show how "skewed" the results will be.
So, in other words... you are admitting that you are cherry picking data.
You realize that this "study" you are citing is all simulator data, right? What does the real world data say? Answer: helmets save lives and reduce brain injuries; FF and open face helmets do this better than half helmets. A FF helmet offers more protection, both from the elements and from frontal impacts. These are the facts.
I don't think the OP (or the study) was saying that FF don't offer more protection, he was pointing out that the vision and hearing impairment MAY lend to an accident. It's just something that's not known.
What I know personally is the only time I ever wore a FF helmet was back in '83 when I borrowed a friends bike and helmet. I was scared to death and couldn't wait to get home and get that obstruction off my head. Couldn't see or hear anywhere near what I was used to with an open 3/4 helmet. Since then, I've never considered wearing a FF helmet. That's my own "study". JMHO.
Last edited by AJSHOVEL; Nov 21, 2018 at 12:09 PM.
What I know personally is the only time I ever wore a FF helmet was back in '83 when I borrowed a friends bike and helmet. I was scared to death and couldn't wait to get home and get that obstruction off my head. Couldn't see or hear anywhere near what I was used to with an open 3/4 helmet. Since then, I've never considered wearing a FF helmet. That's my own "study". JMHO.
When I got my first FF in '72 I felt some restriction in vision. But since I had recently received a cut chin after an incident while wearing a 3/4, and realized the possible bad affects of another 'face plant', I felt the minor loss of vision was a fair trade off. Years later I tried a new FF helmet and was pleasantly surprised by the improved field of vision and noticeably lighter weight. And now they also have vents which allow a cooling breeze over my head and down over my face.
I'm not promoting a FF just sharing my experience.
My decision on what to put or not put on my head while riding is based on my experience acquired during my years of riding. I care more about my opinion and experience than I do about about any study that is out there. And a lot of studies are "out there" .
You believe what you ant to believe - Ill believe what I want to believe... I would have lost my face if not for a ff helmet. I dont care how I look, I dont give a **** that racers use it. If its not a FF that is Snell rated, I dont wear it. How you ride is your choice and thats ok, its not wrong, its not my choice. My SHoei and Arai helmets have outstanding visability and I hear just fine... I also find an open or a 1/2 helmet is too noisy..
Last edited by uncle kebo; Nov 22, 2018 at 11:42 AM.
My decision on what to put or not put on my head while riding is based on my experience acquired during my years of riding. I care more about my opinion and experience than I do about about any study that is out there. And a lot of studies are "out there" .
Exactly what I said, and reason for my decisions. I just posted for awareness and consideration.
Sadly there are lots of people out there (without awareness) happy to make the decision for us on what's good for all bikers.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.