When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I agree use what the owners manual says or higher. I sometimes will run 91 or 93, but my older carbed bikes run on regular 87 as per the owners manual. I havnet really noticed any discernable difference running 93. The bike doesnt go faster or anything like that.
The original question is something that I've wondered about as well. I do run the higher octane in my bike as recommended. What gets me thinking is how bad is it to run a lower octane?
When I did my trip to Alaska a few years ago, most of the gas I could buy at some point was 87 octane. There wasn't even an 89 octane option. I had a KLR650, so I never worried about it, but, I often think of doing another Alaska trip on my Harley. I know people do similar trips on Harleys, so is it all that bad to run 87 octane through a few tanks of gas? Will I lessen the length of life of the engine?
I'm guessing there isn't a hard and fast answer.
How hot it is makes a big difference. My old 04 is referred to as cold blooded. Back before retirement, I rode year round. And put in huge numbers of hours 7 days a week. I did not leave for work in the rain or below freezing. Can slip out most of the time if I saw storms coming. Ten miles on the interstate. Some nights, 70 MPH barely got the temperature dip stick to 150. Summer, it could be at 225 or so.
On those 150 nights, I was literally hugging engine. Nothing sounds like a Harley at 30 degrees weather. Don't think you could make it ping.
Too old for that silliness now.
What is the average temperature you would be running at in Alaska?
I had a real world example of the impact of lower octane fuel on my TriGlide. I bought the ‘12 TriGlide in Oregon, and had the dealer a Stage with the SE 255 cams, They tuned it with 92 octane. Years later, we were in Death Valley, and with my tank hovering nest empty I filled with what was available 87 octane. The road out of Death Valley was a steep 3,000’ climb. I could hear the “tinging” sound you get when the motor is starting to knock, and the knock suppression kicks in. With the power reduction, due to the knock suppression, it was a very slow climb. I’ve climbed just as steep climbs before and after this...with at least 91 octane and never had that issue.
so, yeah if you ride on the flats, and don’t twist the throttle much, you may not notice a difference with lower octane. But put a heavy load on the motor, with lower octane, and the knock suppression will kick in and reduce your power output.
My 17 Ford Expedition Ecoboost 3.5L V-6 Twin Turbo high tech motor requires 87 octane unless towing.
Actually mind NOT blown. Running 87 in your Ecoboost means that you will be down on power as the ECM will retard the output of the motor as it detects knock under load. Running premium will allow the engine to achieve maximum power as it will hold the knock off longer under load. If you are hopping on the highway and commuting in the truck and rarely get into it, or are just a grandpa, run the 87 because you will never notice it. If you're working the truck, or like to put your foot in it, the premium fuel makes a difference. Also, if you've been running lower octane for a while, when switching to higher octane, depending on the programming, it may take time for the ECM to start bumping up the timing to achieve max power.
Also, the truck benefits from a controlled engine temperature from the liquid cooling, the HD does not and it can swing pretty hot. On top of that, combustion chamber shape and other factors will allow certain engines to run lower octane with higher compression. The truck and the HD are apples and oranges for the octane discussion.
Last edited by Ed Ramberger; Jan 29, 2021 at 04:45 PM.
Funny! Everyone here rides a Harley, an expensive motorcycle. Why would anyone buy 87 octane when the owner's manual says 91 or better. What do you want high maintenance bills?
The original question is something that I've wondered about as well. I do run the higher octane in my bike as recommended. What gets me thinking is how bad is it to run a lower octane?
When I did my trip to Alaska a few years ago, most of the gas I could buy at some point was 87 octane. There wasn't even an 89 octane option. I had a KLR650, so I never worried about it, but, I often think of doing another Alaska trip on my Harley. I know people do similar trips on Harleys, so is it all that bad to run 87 octane through a few tanks of gas? Will I lessen the length of life of the engine?
I'm guessing there isn't a hard and fast answer.
Next time go to Alaska on a Honda 50. You'll need 85 octane.
Modern Harleys are pretty sealed on FI bikes. Ethanol is easily good for almost a year. You don't need anything in the fuel tank but gas. If you must, measure it closely for a full tank and fill it to the bottom of filler neck as usual.
While well intentioned I am sure, this is not good advice regarding ethanol fuel. I would advise reading up on phase separation and the hydrophilic nature of ethanol. I would never advise someone to leave ethanol fuel in a tank for a year. That is truly asking for trouble.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.